From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v3 5/9] cgroup/cpuset: Properly disabling partition when partition state switching fails
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:22:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c776fbf-4785-4b10-a7c4-65b54712ec94@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014140548.575122-6-longman@redhat.com>
在 2026/10/14 22:05, Waiman Long 写道:
> Before commit 103b08709e8a ("cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full
> don't leave any housekeeping"), the partition state can be freely switched
> from "root" to "isolated" and vice versa. After that commit, the switch
> from "root" to "isolated" can fail if it exhausts all the housekeeping
> CPUs. Later on, the switch from "isolated" to "root" can also fail if
> some of the partition CPUs are boot-time isolated by "isolcpus".
>
> A local or remote partition is made invalid when the switch fails.
> However there are 2 problems with the existing invalidation code.
>
> 1) Both the subpartitions_cpus and isolated_cpus are not properly
> updated.
> 2) In the case of remote partition with remote_partition flag set, it
> is not cleared.
>
> Fix this by calling the proper partition disabling function in this case.
>
> On an x86 test system with boot option "isolcpus=10 cgroup_debug" set
> and more than 16 cores, the following commands were executed after boot.
>
> # cd /sys/fs/cgroup
> # echo +cpuset > cgroup.subtree_control
> # cat cpuset.cpus.isolated
> 10
> # mkdir A
> # echo 10-12 > A/cpuset.cpus
> # echo isolated > A/cpuset.cpus.partition
> # cat A/cpuset.cpus.partition
> isolated
>
> Before the patch:
>
> # echo root > A/cpuset.cpus.partition
> # cat A/cpuset.cpus.partition
> root invalid (partition config conflicts with housekeeping setup)
> # cat cpuset.cpus.isolated .__DEBUG__.cpuset.cpus.subpartitions
> 10-12
> 10-12
>
> After the patch:
>
> # echo root > A/cpuset.cpus.partition
> # cat A/cpuset.cpus.partition
> root invalid (partition config conflicts with housekeeping setup)
> # cat cpuset.cpus.isolated .__DEBUG__.cpuset.cpus.subpartitions
> 10
>
> Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7f4c57b26ad120ab30adf35653f1dd94@kernel.org/
> Fixes: 4a74e418881f ("cgroup/cpuset: Check partition conflict with housekeeping setup")
> Fixes: 103b08709e8a ("cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any housekeeping")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 51723c299ca5..40c004386af0 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -2866,6 +2866,7 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
> struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cs);
> struct tmpmasks tmpmask;
> bool isolcpus_updated = false;
> + bool disable_partition = false;
>
> if (old_prs == new_prs)
> return 0;
> @@ -2918,15 +2919,21 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
> * A change in load balance state only, no change in cpumasks.
> * Need to update isolated_cpus.
> */
> - if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(new_prs, cs->effective_xcpus))
> + if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(new_prs, cs->effective_xcpus)) {
> + disable_partition = true;
> err = PERR_HKEEPING;
> - else
> + } else {
> isolcpus_updated = true;
> + }
> } else {
> /*
> * Switching back to member is always allowed even if it
> * disables child partitions.
> */
> + disable_partition = true;
> + }
> +
> + if (disable_partition) {
> if (is_remote_partition(cs))
> remote_partition_disable(cs, &tmpmask);
> else
> @@ -2935,7 +2942,7 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
>
> /*
> * Invalidation of child partitions will be done in
> - * update_cpumasks_hier().
> + * update_cpumasks_hier() below.
> */
> }
> out:
> @@ -2954,8 +2961,8 @@ static int update_prstate(struct cpuset *cs, int new_prs)
> isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, new_prs, cs->effective_xcpus);
> spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
>
> - /* Force update if switching back to member & update effective_xcpus */
> - update_cpumasks_hier(cs, &tmpmask, !new_prs);
> + /* Force update if partition is disabled & update effective_xcpus */
> + update_cpumasks_hier(cs, &tmpmask, disable_partition);
>
> /* A newly created partition must have effective_xcpus set */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!old_prs && (new_prs > 0)
Reviewed-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Thanks,
Guopeng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 14:05 [PATCH-next v3 0/9] cgroup/cpuset: Fix various housekeeping check problems Waiman Long
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 1/9] cgroup/cpuset: Fix a missing isolated_cpus update in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-15 13:02 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 2/9] cgroup/cpuset: Consolidate isolated_cpus_can_update() into prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-15 13:03 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 3/9] cgroup/cpuset: Consider all the exclusive CPUs when doing housekeeping check Waiman Long
2026-10-16 2:18 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 4/9] cgroup/cpuset: Do housekeeping check before converting invalid partition to valid Waiman Long
2026-10-16 2:21 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 5/9] cgroup/cpuset: Properly disabling partition when partition state switching fails Waiman Long
2026-10-16 2:22 ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 6/9] cgroup/cpuset: Don't allow a child root partition under an isolated parent Waiman Long
2026-10-16 3:30 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 7/9] selftests/cgroup: Add tests for isolcpus housekeeping check Waiman Long
2026-10-16 3:32 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 8/9] selftests/cgroup: Add tests for nohz_full " Waiman Long
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 9/9] selftests/cgroup: Skip test_cpuset_prs.sh test if some required CPUs are offline Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c776fbf-4785-4b10-a7c4-65b54712ec94@linux.dev \
--to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=benquike@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox