Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v3 4/9] cgroup/cpuset: Do housekeeping check before converting invalid partition to valid
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:21:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6153a50-26a8-45ed-984c-532bab4edb06@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014140548.575122-5-longman@redhat.com>



在 2026/10/14 22:05, Waiman Long 写道:
> When a hotplug event happens or when update_cpumasks_hier() is called, an
> invalid partition may be converted back to valid. However check against
> housekeeping conflict isn't being done which can lead to a partition
> state that violates the housekeeping rules. Update the code to allow
> reviving an invalid partition only if it can pass the housekeeping check.
> 
> Fixes: 4a74e418881f ("cgroup/cpuset: Check partition conflict with housekeeping setup")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index b2684c98d8c0..51723c299ca5 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1959,9 +1959,14 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
>  			bool exclusive = true;
>  
>  			/*
> -			 * Convert invalid partition to valid has to
> -			 * pass the cpu exclusivity test.
> +			 * Convert invalid partition to valid has to pass the
> +			 * cpu exclusivity test as well as the housekeeping
> +			 * check.
>  			 */
> +			if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(cs->partition_root_state, xcpus)) {
> +				part_error = PERR_HKEEPING;
> +				goto write_error;
> +			}
>  			rcu_read_lock();
>  			cpuset_for_each_child(child, css, parent) {
>  				if (child == cs)

Reviewed-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>

Thanks,
Guopeng


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14 14:05 [PATCH-next v3 0/9] cgroup/cpuset: Fix various housekeeping check problems Waiman Long
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 1/9] cgroup/cpuset: Fix a missing isolated_cpus update in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-15 13:02   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 2/9] cgroup/cpuset: Consolidate isolated_cpus_can_update() into prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-15 13:03   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 3/9] cgroup/cpuset: Consider all the exclusive CPUs when doing housekeeping check Waiman Long
2026-10-16  2:18   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 4/9] cgroup/cpuset: Do housekeeping check before converting invalid partition to valid Waiman Long
2026-10-16  2:21   ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 5/9] cgroup/cpuset: Properly disabling partition when partition state switching fails Waiman Long
2026-10-16  2:22   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 6/9] cgroup/cpuset: Don't allow a child root partition under an isolated parent Waiman Long
2026-10-16  3:30   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 7/9] selftests/cgroup: Add tests for isolcpus housekeeping check Waiman Long
2026-10-16  3:32   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 8/9] selftests/cgroup: Add tests for nohz_full " Waiman Long
2026-10-14 14:05 ` [PATCH-next v3 9/9] selftests/cgroup: Skip test_cpuset_prs.sh test if some required CPUs are offline Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a6153a50-26a8-45ed-984c-532bab4edb06@linux.dev \
    --to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=benquike@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox