From: johannes@sipsolutions.net (Johannes Berg)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] modifying initializers with spatch?
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:55:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485507305.5851.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701270807230.1935@hadrien>
On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 08:09 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Partial progress:??The github version will no longer match {} against
> { 0, 1, 2 }, but it persists in matching {} against { .a = 1, .b = 2
> },
> and will still remove the outer braces without removing the rest.
Out of curiosity: will it require some form of "..." to match something
inside now?
We have a few things like this:
@@
identifier x;
identifer fn;
@@
my_time x = {
+#ifdef XYZ
.this_method_needs_xyz = fn,
+#endif
...
};
in backports etc. and I've always wondered why it didn't need (or even
accept, IIRC) ... before the +#ifdef line.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-27 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-26 12:28 [Cocci] modifying initializers with spatch? Johannes Berg
2017-01-26 13:17 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-26 13:32 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-26 14:20 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-26 14:28 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-26 15:47 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-26 15:52 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-26 15:57 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-27 21:43 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-27 21:52 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-27 22:03 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-27 22:09 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-27 22:23 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-27 23:02 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-27 23:20 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-28 6:47 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-28 8:20 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-27 7:09 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-27 8:55 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2017-01-27 13:11 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-27 16:13 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1485507305.5851.1.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox