Coccinelle Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Checking redundant variable initialisations with SmPL?
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:35:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4dfb9359-ab09-d206-3110-0fd177ba34b3@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906221517080.3253@hadrien>

> It could be helpful to replace the last line by:
>
> (
>   e3 = <+...var...+>

Can this SmPL specification make sense as another when constraint?


> |
> * var = e3
> )
>
> In that case, it would also be beneficial to remove the *

I find the asterisk required here


> on the variable declaration

so that a potentially unused value is marked for the discussed
variable initialisation.


> because that will be activated regardless of which branch matches
> in the disjunction.

Will further data flow analysis influence such a view any more?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-22 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-20 12:30 [Cocci] Checking redundant variable initialisations with SmPL? Markus Elfring
2019-06-21 20:52 ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-22 13:15   ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-22 13:19     ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-22 13:35       ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-06-22 13:58         ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-22 14:16           ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-23  7:48           ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-23 12:48           ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-23 12:55             ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-23 13:05               ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-23 13:13                 ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-23 14:17                   ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-23 13:05               ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-23 12:48           ` Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4dfb9359-ab09-d206-3110-0fd177ba34b3@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox