From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] 1.0.0-rc16: Further fine-tuning for the build system?
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:10:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517A4495.20406@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130426081434.GA3645@redhat.com>
> [Since you asked me in private email to contribute to this discussion ...]
I am trying to find more software developers and packagers who know the
Autotools good enough. I hope that corresponding updates can be reviewed
in a constructive way then.
> I think you're being unreasonable asking the Coccinelle developers to
> fix things, and hardly specifying what the problem is (from what I can
> gather it's something to do with separated builds not working?).
Are you used to conditions which should be considered for the topic
"out-of-source builds / parallel build trees"?
I pointed out some open issues to make the build configuration
consistent again.
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2013-March/000220.html
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.coccinelle/3054
> In any case, supply patches, with clear explanations behind each one.
I got responses from Julia that she is not in the mood for the
integration of fixes for the current build setup so far.
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-26 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-02 21:02 [Cocci] 1.0.0-rc16: Further fine-tuning for the build system? SF Markus Elfring
2013-03-02 21:18 ` Julia Lawall
2013-03-04 11:35 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-03-04 12:36 ` Julia Lawall
2013-03-04 12:37 ` Julia Lawall
2013-03-04 12:43 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-03-04 12:48 ` Julia Lawall
2013-03-04 13:14 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-03-04 13:54 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-03-04 15:40 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-03-04 15:47 ` Julia Lawall
2013-03-04 16:05 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-03-05 8:36 ` Arie Middelkoop
2013-03-07 15:54 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-03-07 16:27 ` Arie Middelkoop
2013-03-07 17:07 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-03-16 20:07 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-03-17 12:18 ` Arie Middelkoop
2013-03-18 9:50 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-04-07 10:51 ` [Cocci] 1.0.0-rc17: " SF Markus Elfring
2013-04-07 11:05 ` Julia Lawall
2013-04-07 11:14 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-04-07 11:20 ` Julia Lawall
2013-04-07 11:30 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-04-07 11:43 ` Julia Lawall
2013-04-07 12:07 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-04-07 12:11 ` Julia Lawall
2013-04-07 12:13 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-04-26 8:14 ` [Cocci] 1.0.0-rc16: " Richard W.M. Jones
2013-04-26 9:10 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2013-04-26 9:16 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-04-26 9:36 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-04-26 9:52 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-04-26 10:15 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-04-26 10:25 ` Julia Lawall
2013-04-26 11:03 ` Peter Senna Tschudin
2013-04-26 11:28 ` SF Markus Elfring
2013-04-29 9:52 ` [Cocci] 1.0.0-rc17: " SF Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517A4495.20406@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox