Linux Container Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] user namespaces: require cap_set{ug}id for CLONE_NEWUSER
@ 2008-12-01 18:52 Serge E. Hallyn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2008-12-01 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric W. Biederman, Linux Containers

thoughts?  (patch is on top of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6.git#next)

thanks,
-serge

Subject: [PATCH] user namespaces: require cap_set{ug}id for CLONE_NEWUSER

While ideally CLONE_NEWUSER will eventually require no
privilege, the required permission checks are currently
not there.  As a result, CLONE_NEWUSER has the same effect
as a setuid(0)+setgroups(1,"0").  While we already require
CAP_SYS_ADMIN, requiring CAP_SETUID and CAP_SETGID seems
appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

---

 kernel/fork.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

32c36be0621dba3bf05af3d2df843ce803d25831
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 1dd8945..e3a85b3 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1344,7 +1344,8 @@ long do_fork(unsigned long clone_flags,
 		/* hopefully this check will go away when userns support is
 		 * complete
 		 */
-		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || !capable(CAP_SETUID) ||
+				!capable(CAP_SETGID))
 			return -EPERM;
 	}
 
-- 
1.1.6

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-12-01 18:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-01 18:52 [PATCH] user namespaces: require cap_set{ug}id for CLONE_NEWUSER Serge E. Hallyn

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox