Linux Container Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] powerpc: catch 32/64bit mix
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:16:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091125191617.GA11814@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B0D7F96.6050100-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>

Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org):
> 
> I can't recall a convincing reason why restore_{thread,cpu}() should
> run so late, or in particular after restore_task_objs().
> 
> I think the original motivation was to avoid the point-of-no-return
> at a very early stage. However this is only useful for self-restart.
> 
> If we ever want self-restart to fail gracefully should something go
> wrong, we should be prepared to undo any changes to the process -
> on the error path. While not beyond reach, it isn't a top priority.
> 
> Does calling restore_{thread,cpu}() earlier solve the problem ?

Yes, it does.

> BTW, this is also relevant for x86-64...

and also 31-bit s390

-serge

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-25 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-25 16:22 [PATCH RFC] powerpc: catch 32/64bit mix Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found] ` <20091125162250.GA9034-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 19:03   ` Oren Laadan
     [not found]     ` <4B0D7F96.6050100-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 19:16       ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
     [not found]         ` <20091125191617.GA11814-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 20:32           ` Oren Laadan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091125191617.GA11814@us.ibm.com \
    --to=serue-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox