From: Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] powerpc: catch 32/64bit mix
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:32:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0D9468.3050606@cs.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091125191617.GA11814-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org):
>> I can't recall a convincing reason why restore_{thread,cpu}() should
>> run so late, or in particular after restore_task_objs().
>>
>> I think the original motivation was to avoid the point-of-no-return
>> at a very early stage. However this is only useful for self-restart.
>>
>> If we ever want self-restart to fail gracefully should something go
>> wrong, we should be prepared to undo any changes to the process -
>> on the error path. While not beyond reach, it isn't a top priority.
>>
>> Does calling restore_{thread,cpu}() earlier solve the problem ?
>
> Yes, it does.
>
>> BTW, this is also relevant for x86-64...
>
> and also 31-bit s390
Excellent. Then I'll change the order for v19-rc2.
Thanks,
Oren.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-25 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-25 16:22 [PATCH RFC] powerpc: catch 32/64bit mix Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20091125162250.GA9034-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 19:03 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4B0D7F96.6050100-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 19:16 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20091125191617.GA11814-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 20:32 ` Oren Laadan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0D9468.3050606@cs.columbia.edu \
--to=orenl-eqauephvms7envbuuze7ea@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox