From: Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
<sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Luis Rilling
<Louis.Rilling-aw0BnHfMbSpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Containers
<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][usercr]: Ghost tasks must be detached
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 07:18:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D528629.7030905@cs.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110209120100.GD13323-Hu8+6S1rdjywhHL9vcZdMVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
On 02/09/2011 07:01 AM, Louis Rilling wrote:
> On 08/02/11 18:09 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>> Oren Laadan [orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org] wrote:
>> |
>> |
>> | On 02/05/2011 04:40 PM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>> | > Oren Laadan [orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org] wrote:
>> | > | Suka,
>> | > |
>> | > | This patch - and the corresponding kernel patch - are wrong
>> | >
>> | > Ah, I see that now.
>> | >
>> | > But am not sure about the kernel part though. We were getting a crash
>> | > reliably (with older kernels) because of the ->exit_signal = -1 in
>> | > do_ghost_task().
>> |
>> | Are we still getting it with 2.6.37 ?
>>
>> I am not currently getting the crash on 2.6.37 - I thought it was due to
>> the following commit which removed the check for task_detached() in
>> do_wait_thread().
>>
>> commit 9cd80bbb07fcd6d4d037fad4297496d3b132ac6b
>> Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> Date: Thu Dec 17 15:27:15 2009 -0800
>
> I don't think that this introduced the bug. The bug triggers with EXIT_DEAD
> tasks, for which wait() must ignore (see below). So, the bug looks still there
> in 2.6.37.
>
>>
>> But if that is true, I need to investigate why Louis Rilling was getting
>> the crash in Jun 2010 - which he tried to fix here:
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/16/295
>
> I was getting the crash on Kerrighed, which heavily patches the 2.6.30 kernel.
> I could reproduce it on vanilla Linux of the moment (2.6.35-rc3), but
> only after introducing artificial delays in release_task().
>
> IIRC, what triggers the crash is some exiting detached task in the
> pid_namespace, which goes EXIT_DEAD, and as such cannot be reaped by
> zap_pid_ns_processes()->sys_wait4(). So with some odd timing, the detached
> task can call proc_flush_task() after container init does, which triggers the
> proc_mnt crash.
>
> Container init Some detached task in the ctnr
> exit_notify()
> ->exit_state = EXIT_DEAD
> exit_notify()
> forget_original_parent()
> find_new_reaper()
> zap_pid_ns_processes()
> sys_wait4()
> /* cannot reap EXIT_DEAD tasks */
> /* reparents EXIT_DEAD tasks to global init */
>
> Container reaper
> release_task()
> proc_flush_task()
> pid_ns_release_proc()
> release_task()
> proc_flush_task()
> proc_flush_task_mnt()
> KABOOM
Louis, thanks for the explanation, and two follow-up questions:
1) Is there a patch circulating for this ? or even better, on the
way to mainline ?
2) Would it suffice if the c/r code ensures that the init never
exits before any EXIT_DEAD tasks ?
Thanks,
Oren.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-11 3:35 [PATCH][usercr]: Ghost tasks must be detached Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20101211033548.GA12584-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-11 1:51 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4D2BB78A.9090701-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-05 18:55 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4D4D9D1B.3000209-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-05 21:40 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20110205214032.GA12944-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-05 22:02 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4D4DC90B.3010103-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-05 22:33 ` Oren Laadan
2011-02-09 2:09 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20110209020942.GA5339-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-09 3:35 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4D520B78.9020300-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-10 2:44 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20110210024430.GA23167-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-10 3:53 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4D536154.8000900-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-10 6:17 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20110210061730.GA25432-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-10 14:56 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <4D53FC9C.1050405-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-10 17:42 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2011-02-16 20:10 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20110216201019.GA27698-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-17 15:21 ` Louis Rilling
[not found] ` <20110217152116.GM518-Hu8+6S1rdjywhHL9vcZdMVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-21 20:40 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20110221204058.GC14377-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-22 10:28 ` Louis Rilling
2011-02-09 12:01 ` Louis Rilling
[not found] ` <20110209120100.GD13323-Hu8+6S1rdjywhHL9vcZdMVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-09 12:18 ` Oren Laadan [this message]
[not found] ` <4D528629.7030905-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-09 12:35 ` Louis Rilling
[not found] ` <20110209123550.GG13323-Hu8+6S1rdjywhHL9vcZdMVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-09 12:37 ` Louis Rilling
2011-02-09 19:02 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20110209190216.GA17051-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-10 10:23 ` Louis Rilling
[not found] ` <20110210102312.GC6360-Hu8+6S1rdjywhHL9vcZdMVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-10 17:54 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20110210175409.GB1025-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-10 18:04 ` Louis Rilling
[not found] ` <20110210180433.GI6360-Hu8+6S1rdjywhHL9vcZdMVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-10 22:31 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2011-02-25 7:58 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
[not found] ` <20110225075808.GC24361-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-25 15:46 ` Oren Laadan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D528629.7030905@cs.columbia.edu \
--to=orenl-eqauephvms7envbuuze7ea@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Louis.Rilling-aw0BnHfMbSpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox