Linux Container Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: taking a crack at targeted capabilities
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:56:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m17hrv18ad.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100106062809.GA17064-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> (Serge E. Hallyn's message of "Wed\, 6 Jan 2010 00\:28\:09 -0600")

"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> writes:

> So i was thinking about how to safely but incrementally introduce
> targeted capabilities - which we decided was a prereq to making VFS
> handle user namespaces - and the following seemed doable.  My main
> motivations were (in order):
>
>         1. don't make any unconverted capable() checks unsafe
>         2. minimize performance impact on non-container case
>         3. minimize performance impact on containers

My motivation is a bit different.  I would like to get to the
unprivileged creation of new namespaces.  It looks like this gets us
90% of the way there, with only potential uid confusion issues left.

I still need to handle getting all caps after creation but otherwise I
think I have a good starter patch that achieves all of your goals.

Of course kill_permission needs the checks you have suggested as well.

Eric


From db104af741b5f0a2f128688905498cae68fbbde2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:26:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] security:  Make capabilities relative to the user namespace.

- Introduce ns_capable to test for a capability in a non-default
  user namespace.
- Teach cap_capable to handle capabilities in a non-default
  user namespace.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
---
 include/linux/capability.h |    6 ++++--
 include/linux/security.h   |   12 +++++++-----
 kernel/capability.c        |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 security/commoncap.c       |   40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 security/security.c        |   12 ++++++------
 security/selinux/hooks.c   |   14 +++++++++-----
 6 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
index 39e5ff5..89572b2 100644
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_init_eff_set;
  *
  * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
  */
-#define has_capability(t, cap) (security_real_capable((t), (cap)) == 0)
+#define has_capability(t, cap) (security_real_capable((t), &init_user_ns, (cap)) == 0)
 
 /**
  * has_capability_noaudit - Determine if a task has a superior capability available (unaudited)
@@ -558,9 +558,11 @@ extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_init_eff_set;
  * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
  */
 #define has_capability_noaudit(t, cap) \
-	(security_real_capable_noaudit((t), (cap)) == 0)
+	(security_real_capable_noaudit((t), &init_user_ns, (cap)) == 0)
 
+struct user_namespace;
 extern int capable(int cap);
+extern int ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
 
 /* audit system wants to get cap info from files as well */
 struct dentry;
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 2c627d3..f44932f 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -45,13 +45,14 @@
 
 struct ctl_table;
 struct audit_krule;
+struct user_namespace;
 
 /*
  * These functions are in security/capability.c and are used
  * as the default capabilities functions
  */
 extern int cap_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred,
-		       int cap, int audit);
+		       struct user_namespace *ns, int cap, int audit);
 extern int cap_settime(struct timespec *ts, struct timezone *tz);
 extern int cap_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int mode);
 extern int cap_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent);
@@ -1327,6 +1328,7 @@ static inline void security_free_mnt_opts(struct security_mnt_opts *opts)
  *	credentials.
  *	@tsk contains the task_struct for the process.
  *	@cred contains the credentials to use.
+ *      @ns contains the user namespace we want the capability in
  *	@cap contains the capability <include/linux/capability.h>.
  *	@audit: Whether to write an audit message or not
  *	Return 0 if the capability is granted for @tsk.
@@ -1457,7 +1459,7 @@ struct security_operations {
 		       const kernel_cap_t *inheritable,
 		       const kernel_cap_t *permitted);
 	int (*capable) (struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred,
-			int cap, int audit);
+			struct user_namespace *ns, int cap, int audit);
 	int (*acct) (struct file *file);
 	int (*sysctl) (struct ctl_table *table, int op);
 	int (*quotactl) (int cmds, int type, int id, struct super_block *sb);
@@ -1754,9 +1756,9 @@ int security_capset(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
 		    const kernel_cap_t *effective,
 		    const kernel_cap_t *inheritable,
 		    const kernel_cap_t *permitted);
-int security_capable(int cap);
-int security_real_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap);
-int security_real_capable_noaudit(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap);
+int security_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
+int security_real_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
+int security_real_capable_noaudit(struct task_struct *tsk, struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
 int security_acct(struct file *file);
 int security_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int op);
 int security_quotactl(int cmds, int type, int id, struct super_block *sb);
diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
index 7f876e6..63dcf53 100644
--- a/kernel/capability.c
+++ b/kernel/capability.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/security.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
+#include <linux/user_namespace.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include "cred-internals.h"
 
@@ -302,15 +303,32 @@ error:
  */
 int capable(int cap)
 {
+	return ns_capable(&init_user_ns, cap);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable);
+
+/**
+ * ns_capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect
+ * @ns:  The usernamespace we want the capability in
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability currently
+ * available for use, false if not.
+ *
+ * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
+ * assumption that it's about to be used.
+ */
+int ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
+{
 	if (unlikely(!cap_valid(cap))) {
 		printk(KERN_CRIT "capable() called with invalid cap=%u\n", cap);
 		BUG();
 	}
 
-	if (security_capable(cap) == 0) {
+	if (security_capable(ns, cap) == 0) {
 		current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
 		return 1;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable);
diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
index 34500e3..ffde5be 100644
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/prctl.h>
 #include <linux/securebits.h>
+#include <linux/user_namespace.h>
 
 /*
  * If a non-root user executes a setuid-root binary in
@@ -68,6 +69,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cap_netlink_recv);
  * cap_capable - Determine whether a task has a particular effective capability
  * @tsk: The task to query
  * @cred: The credentials to use
+ * @ns:  The user namespace in which we need the capability
  * @cap: The capability to check for
  * @audit: Whether to write an audit message or not
  *
@@ -79,10 +81,32 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cap_netlink_recv);
  * cap_has_capability() returns 0 when a task has a capability, but the
  * kernel's capable() and has_capability() returns 1 for this case.
  */
-int cap_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred, int cap,
-		int audit)
+int cap_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred,
+		struct user_namespace *targ_ns, int cap, int audit)
 {
-	return cap_raised(cred->cap_effective, cap) ? 0 : -EPERM;
+	for (;;) {
+		/* Do we have the necessary capabilities? */
+		if (targ_ns == cred->user->user_ns)
+			return cap_raised(cred->cap_effective, cap) ? 0 : -EPERM;
+	
+		/* The creator of the user namespace has all caps. */
+		if (targ_ns->creator == cred->user)
+			return 0;
+	
+		/* Have we tried all of the parent namespaces? */
+		if (targ_ns == &init_user_ns)
+			return -EPERM;
+	
+		/* If you have the capability in a parent user ns you have it
+		 * in the over all children user namespaces as well, so see
+		 * if this process has the capability in the parent user
+		 * namespace.
+		 */
+		targ_ns = targ_ns->creator->user_ns;
+	}
+	
+	/* We never get here */
+	return -EPERM;                
 }
 
 /**
@@ -177,7 +201,8 @@ static inline int cap_inh_is_capped(void)
 	/* they are so limited unless the current task has the CAP_SETPCAP
 	 * capability
 	 */
-	if (cap_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_SETPCAP,
+	if (cap_capable(current, current_cred(),
+			current_cred()->user->user_ns, CAP_SETPCAP,
 			SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT) == 0)
 		return 0;
 	return 1;
@@ -832,7 +857,8 @@ int cap_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
 		     & (new->securebits ^ arg2))			/*[1]*/
 		    || ((new->securebits & SECURE_ALL_LOCKS & ~arg2))	/*[2]*/
 		    || (arg2 & ~(SECURE_ALL_LOCKS | SECURE_ALL_BITS))	/*[3]*/
-		    || (cap_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_SETPCAP,
+		    || (cap_capable(current, current_cred(),
+				    current_cred()->user->user_ns, CAP_SETPCAP,
 				    SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT) != 0)		/*[4]*/
 			/*
 			 * [1] no changing of bits that are locked
@@ -910,7 +936,7 @@ int cap_vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
 {
 	int cap_sys_admin = 0;
 
-	if (cap_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
+	if (cap_capable(current, current_cred(), &init_user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
 			SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT) == 0)
 		cap_sys_admin = 1;
 	return __vm_enough_memory(mm, pages, cap_sys_admin);
@@ -937,7 +963,7 @@ int cap_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long reqprot,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (addr < dac_mmap_min_addr) {
-		ret = cap_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_SYS_RAWIO,
+		ret = cap_capable(current, current_cred(), &init_user_ns, CAP_SYS_RAWIO,
 				  SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
 		/* set PF_SUPERPRIV if it turns out we allow the low mmap */
 		if (ret == 0)
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 24e060b..ad75427 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -155,30 +155,30 @@ int security_capset(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
 				    effective, inheritable, permitted);
 }
 
-int security_capable(int cap)
+int security_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
 {
-	return security_ops->capable(current, current_cred(), cap,
+	return security_ops->capable(current, current_cred(), ns, cap,
 				     SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
 }
 
-int security_real_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap)
+int security_real_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
 {
 	const struct cred *cred;
 	int ret;
 
 	cred = get_task_cred(tsk);
-	ret = security_ops->capable(tsk, cred, cap, SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
+	ret = security_ops->capable(tsk, cred, ns, cap, SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
 	put_cred(cred);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-int security_real_capable_noaudit(struct task_struct *tsk, int cap)
+int security_real_capable_noaudit(struct task_struct *tsk, struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
 {
 	const struct cred *cred;
 	int ret;
 
 	cred = get_task_cred(tsk);
-	ret = security_ops->capable(tsk, cred, cap, SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
+	ret = security_ops->capable(tsk, cred, ns, cap, SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
 	put_cred(cred);
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index bd77a2b..a69f97d 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
 #include <linux/selinux.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/posix-timers.h>
+#include <linux/user_namespace.h>
 
 #include "avc.h"
 #include "objsec.h"
@@ -1480,6 +1481,7 @@ static int current_has_perm(const struct task_struct *tsk,
 /* Check whether a task is allowed to use a capability. */
 static int task_has_capability(struct task_struct *tsk,
 			       const struct cred *cred,
+			       struct user_namespace *ns,
 			       int cap, int audit)
 {
 	struct common_audit_data ad;
@@ -1927,15 +1929,15 @@ static int selinux_capset(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
  */
 
 static int selinux_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred,
-			   int cap, int audit)
+			   struct user_namespace *ns, int cap, int audit)
 {
 	int rc;
 
-	rc = cap_capable(tsk, cred, cap, audit);
+	rc = cap_capable(tsk, cred, ns, cap, audit);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
 
-	return task_has_capability(tsk, cred, cap, audit);
+	return task_has_capability(tsk, cred, ns, cap, audit);
 }
 
 static int selinux_sysctl_get_sid(ctl_table *table, u16 tclass, u32 *sid)
@@ -2091,7 +2093,8 @@ static int selinux_vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
 {
 	int rc, cap_sys_admin = 0;
 
-	rc = selinux_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
+	rc = selinux_capable(current, current_cred(),
+			     &init_user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
 			     SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
 	if (rc == 0)
 		cap_sys_admin = 1;
@@ -2889,7 +2892,8 @@ static int selinux_inode_getsecurity(const struct inode *inode, const char *name
 	 * and lack of permission just means that we fall back to the
 	 * in-core context value, not a denial.
 	 */
-	error = selinux_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_MAC_ADMIN,
+	error = selinux_capable(current, current_cred(),
+				&init_user_ns, CAP_MAC_ADMIN,
 				SECURITY_CAP_NOAUDIT);
 	if (!error)
 		error = security_sid_to_context_force(isec->sid, &context,
-- 
1.6.5.2.143.g8cc62

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-06 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-06  6:28 [PATCH 1/1] RFC: taking a crack at targeted capabilities Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found] ` <20100106062809.GA17064-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 15:44   ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]     ` <m13a2j2q7c.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 17:30       ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]         ` <20100106173056.GC15784-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 20:43           ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-06 16:56   ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
     [not found]     ` <m17hrv18ad.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 17:35       ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]         ` <20100106173536.GD15784-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 20:57           ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-06 20:17       ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]         ` <20100106201725.GA24242-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 21:11           ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]             ` <m1skajszuw.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-06 21:57               ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]                 ` <20100106215721.GA5823-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-07  0:16                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-15 14:27           ` Matt Helsley
     [not found]             ` <20100215142746.GD3714-52DBMbEzqgQ/wnmkkaCWp/UQ3DHhIser@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-15 16:16               ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]                 ` <m13a12bhjq.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-15 16:37                   ` Matt Helsley
     [not found]                     ` <20100215163708.GG3714-52DBMbEzqgQ/wnmkkaCWp/UQ3DHhIser@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-15 16:48                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-15  4:05       ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]         ` <20100215040529.GA20519-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-15 11:06           ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]             ` <m1ocjqep25.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-16 22:07               ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m17hrv18ad.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm-as9lmozglivwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox