* newbie: Patch Confusion, P4 not supported?
@ 2003-06-18 11:45 Simon
2003-06-18 14:13 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-06-18 14:24 ` Ducrot Bruno
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Simon @ 2003-06-18 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
Hi,
Sorry about the dumb newbie question. Can't find any docs on this.
I just upgraded to a vanilla 2.4.21 kernel, and want to add cpufreq support
back for my Intel P4, in my Thinkpad A31p.
I had this working with 2.4.20, using the 'advanced' patch from
http://www.brodo.de/cpufreq/, and controlling it by echo-ing stuff to
/proc/cpufreq
I couldn't make any of the patches on www.brodo.de/cpufreq_old apply to my
kernel cleanly. They look rather old, and the page is no longer in use. So I
donloaded the latest patch from ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/cpufreq/
(ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/cpufreq/cpufreq-LINUX_2_4-20030617.tar.bz2)
and applied this.
Now, it says that my cpu is unsupported. As follows:
shiro proc # dmesg | grep cpufreq
cpufreq: Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) support $Revision: 1.7.2.6 $
cpufreq: Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) for this processor not (yet) available.
/proc/cpufreq no longer exists.
Seems strange. It *used* to work with the old patch, but somehow has decided
not to work with the new one. Am I missing some kernel parameter or
something? Or has support been taken out? Or am I using the wrong patch?
Thanks
Simon
output of /proc/cpuinfo follows:
shiro linux # cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 2
model name : Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 1199.045
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips : 2385.51
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: newbie: Patch Confusion, P4 not supported?
2003-06-18 11:45 newbie: Patch Confusion, P4 not supported? Simon
@ 2003-06-18 14:13 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-06-18 17:36 ` Simon
2003-06-18 14:24 ` Ducrot Bruno
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dominik Brodowski @ 2003-06-18 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon; +Cc: cpufreq
Hi Simon,
> I couldn't make any of the patches on www.brodo.de/cpufreq_old apply to my
> kernel cleanly. They look rather old, and the page is no longer in use.
Indeed. That's why it's named cpufreq_old :-)
Fortunately, though, Dave Jones took over as maintainer. You can find an
upgraded backport of cpufreq for 2.4.21-rc8 (which is [almost] the same as
2.4.21]) at
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cpufreq/
Dominik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: newbie: Patch Confusion, P4 not supported?
2003-06-18 14:24 ` Ducrot Bruno
@ 2003-06-18 14:22 ` Simon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Simon @ 2003-06-18 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ducrot Bruno; +Cc: cpufreq
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 3:24 pm, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> This is even more older than the one you downloaded from Dominik
> site... Try the latest ac in the meantime.
Oh... The filename 20030617 made it sound pretty new... And it seemed to apply
to 2.4.21 okay, so thought it was more recently updated.
I'm reluctant to use -ac, because the other patches I like to apply to my
kernels don't like it too much. Is there no patch around that applies onto
2.4.21 vanilla?
I guess it's no big deal I can go back to my old kernel for now.
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: newbie: Patch Confusion, P4 not supported?
2003-06-18 11:45 newbie: Patch Confusion, P4 not supported? Simon
2003-06-18 14:13 ` Dominik Brodowski
@ 2003-06-18 14:24 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-06-18 14:22 ` Simon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ducrot Bruno @ 2003-06-18 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon; +Cc: cpufreq
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:45:07PM +0100, Simon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry about the dumb newbie question. Can't find any docs on this.
>
> I just upgraded to a vanilla 2.4.21 kernel, and want to add cpufreq support
> back for my Intel P4, in my Thinkpad A31p.
>
> I had this working with 2.4.20, using the 'advanced' patch from
> http://www.brodo.de/cpufreq/, and controlling it by echo-ing stuff to
> /proc/cpufreq
>
> I couldn't make any of the patches on www.brodo.de/cpufreq_old apply to my
> kernel cleanly. They look rather old, and the page is no longer in use. So I
> donloaded the latest patch from ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/cpufreq/
> (ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/cpufreq/cpufreq-LINUX_2_4-20030617.tar.bz2)
> and applied this.
This is even more older than the one you downloaded from Dominik
site... Try the latest ac in the meantime.
--
Ducrot Bruno
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: newbie: Patch Confusion, P4 not supported?
2003-06-18 14:13 ` Dominik Brodowski
@ 2003-06-18 17:36 ` Simon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Simon @ 2003-06-18 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dominik Brodowski; +Cc: cpufreq
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 3:13 pm, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Fortunately, though, Dave Jones took over as maintainer. You can find an
> upgraded backport of cpufreq for 2.4.21-rc8 (which is [almost] the same as
> 2.4.21]) at
> http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cpufreq/
That did it, thanks! :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-18 17:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-18 11:45 newbie: Patch Confusion, P4 not supported? Simon
2003-06-18 14:13 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-06-18 17:36 ` Simon
2003-06-18 14:24 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-06-18 14:22 ` Simon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox