cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH][DOCUMENTATION BUGFIX] latency in micro-, not nanoseconds
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 17:08:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031104160816.GA9187@brodo.de> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 720 bytes --]

All drivers [davej, can you please verify for powernow-k7?] set the 
transition_latency time in microseconds, even though the core demanded
nanoseconds. Instead of fixing up the drivers, fix up the core...

	Dominik

diff -ruN linux-original/include/linux/cpufreq.h linux/include/linux/cpufreq.h
--- linux-original/include/linux/cpufreq.h	2003-11-04 15:27:38.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/include/linux/cpufreq.h	2003-11-04 16:09:23.547389216 +0100
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
 struct cpufreq_cpuinfo {
 	unsigned int		max_freq;
 	unsigned int		min_freq;
-	unsigned int		transition_latency; /* in 10^(-9) s */
+	unsigned int		transition_latency; /* in 10^(-6) s = microseconds */
 };
 
 struct cpufreq_real_policy {

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Cpufreq mailing list
Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq

             reply	other threads:[~2003-11-04 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-04 16:08 Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2003-11-10 16:32 ` [PATCH][DOCUMENTATION BUGFIX] latency in micro-, not nanoseconds Dave Jones
2003-11-10 17:15   ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-11-10 17:22     ` Dave Jones
2003-11-10 20:50       ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-11-10 21:16         ` Dave Jones
2003-11-11 18:54           ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-11-11 22:45             ` Dave Jones
2003-11-12 11:01               ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-11-12 14:17                 ` Dave Jones
2003-11-12 15:02                   ` Ducrot Bruno
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-11 19:57 Pallipadi, Venkatesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031104160816.GA9187@brodo.de \
    --to=linux@brodo.de \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox