cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>
To: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: p4-clockmod doesn't seem to allow the highest possible speed
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:18:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040110131824.GA5010@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040110110800.GA8294@grep.be>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1050 bytes --]

On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 12:08:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Vanilla 2.6.1, but I had the same problem with 2.6.0 (didn't try
> p4-clockmod on any kernel before that).

You shouldn't need to use p4-clockmod at all... speedstep-ich is a better
choice for your system... Nonetheless, let us find the bug:

> > What does "dmesg" tell us?
> 
> 234 lines of output. Seems a bit excessive to put that in this mail, so
> I've put it on <http://users.pandora.be/wouter.verhelst/cpufreq.tgz>,
> together with the contents of /proc/cpuinfo and my .config. If you need
> any further information, please ask.

Thank you very much. Two questions: Do the init scripts modprobe either 
the acpi module (acpi.ko) or the speedstep-ich module (speedstep-ich.ko)
anyway? What does /proc/cpuinfo say before modprobing p4-clockmod, and
after modprobing p4-clockmod?

Also, could you please uncomment the printk in line 190 of
linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c and send me a diff of the
dmesgs?

Thank you very much,
	Dominik

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Cpufreq mailing list
Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-10 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-09 18:18 p4-clockmod doesn't seem to allow the highest possible speed Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 10:15 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-10 11:08   ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 13:18     ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2004-01-10 15:02       ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 15:38         ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-10 16:30           ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 15:21       ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 15:41         ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-10 16:32           ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 18:53             ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-10 19:35               ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-11 15:48                 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-11 17:30                   ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-11 18:05                     ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-11 17:35                 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-11 19:56                   ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-11 20:06                     ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-11 20:24                       ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-12 12:26                     ` Ducrot Bruno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040110131824.GA5010@dominikbrodowski.de \
    --to=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wouter@grep.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox