From: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot@poupinou.org>
To: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: p4-clockmod doesn't seem to allow the highest possible speed
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:53:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040110185308.GZ14031@poupinou.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040110163212.GD10531@grep.be>
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:32:12PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 04:41:10PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 04:21:45PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 02:18:24PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 12:08:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > > > Vanilla 2.6.1, but I had the same problem with 2.6.0 (didn't try
> > > > > p4-clockmod on any kernel before that).
> > > >
> > > > You shouldn't need to use p4-clockmod at all... speedstep-ich is a better
> > > > choice for your system...
> > >
> > > This doesn't seem to work, it says 'No such device'. I have a VIA 82C686
> > > south bridge, not an Intel one, so I guess that's the reason.
> >
> > Unfortunately, you're right. VIA doesn't publish their spec sheets as Intel
> > does, so there's no speedstep-via driver (yet). Maybe acpi.ko works?
>
> It does, but when my CPU is throttled, it makes an uncomfortable sound
> at high frequency, so I try to avoid that.
>
Do you mean the processor is at high speed (performance), and throttling
is enabled?
So it should not be even surprising.
The P4 is able to throttle itself, so I guess the throttling
things done externally by the south bridge would have not even
been tested by the platform designer...
--
Ducrot Bruno
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-10 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-09 18:18 p4-clockmod doesn't seem to allow the highest possible speed Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 10:15 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-10 11:08 ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 13:18 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-10 15:02 ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 15:38 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-10 16:30 ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 15:21 ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 15:41 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-10 16:32 ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-10 18:53 ` Ducrot Bruno [this message]
2004-01-10 19:35 ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-11 15:48 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-11 17:30 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-11 18:05 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-11 17:35 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-11 19:56 ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-11 20:06 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-11 20:24 ` Wouter Verhelst
2004-01-12 12:26 ` Ducrot Bruno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040110185308.GZ14031@poupinou.org \
--to=ducrot@poupinou.org \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wouter@grep.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox