From: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot@poupinou.org>
To: visyz@visyz.net
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Pentium III (Coppermine) cpufreq support
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:50:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040129105041.GV25416@poupinou.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040129051600.GA6087@visyz.net>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:16:00AM -0500, visyz@visyz.net wrote:
> So, I think I'm one of the 3 people in the world who have a Mobile
> Pentium III (Coppermine).
>
> The other two aren't making any noise about how this sucker's SpeedStep
> is supposed to work. Any suggestions?
I receive more emails on this topics than 'two'...
> Heh. Yeah. anyways. I have an HP Omnibook 4150B, which amounts to the
> aforementioned coppermine (with speeds from 233-450mhz), on a
> 440BX/ZX/DX bridge. I tried out the test program to see if it's usable,
> and while 1 bit did change, it was in GOP 0x0034, not 0x0038. Or maybe
> that's the other way around. Basically, the one that was supposed to
> change didn't, and the one that wasn't, did.
What program? Mine? Also are you sure you looked in the web page.
It's up to the manufacturer to *decide* what GPO to use. So there
is *no* possibility to know the correct GPO pin.
> Are those in charge of the cpufreq development interested in getting the
> dump still,
Yes, or else I would not publish it, you know. Just that this dump
should be send to me privately, not in the cpufreq developper list.
> or have you moved on to bigger and better (tm) processors?
Actually, I never owned a laptop with a PIII coppermine with
a 440BX/ZX/DX bridge FYI. I had a PIII coppermine, but with
a ich southbridge.
Cheers,
--
Ducrot Bruno
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-29 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-29 5:16 Pentium III (Coppermine) cpufreq support visyz
2004-01-29 9:26 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-29 8:50 ` aeriksson2
2004-01-29 11:35 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29 9:31 ` aeriksson
2004-01-29 12:39 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29 10:40 ` Anders Eriksson
2004-01-29 14:26 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29 13:18 ` aeriksson2
2004-01-29 16:10 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29 10:56 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29 20:47 ` visyz
2004-01-29 10:50 ` Ducrot Bruno [this message]
2004-01-29 20:28 ` visyz
2004-01-30 9:25 ` Ducrot Bruno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040129105041.GV25416@poupinou.org \
--to=ducrot@poupinou.org \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=visyz@visyz.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox