cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: visyz@visyz.net
To: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot@poupinou.org>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Pentium III (Coppermine) cpufreq support
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:28:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040129202824.GA7866@visyz.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040129105041.GV25416@poupinou.org>

From Ducrot Bruno on Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:50:41AM +0100:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:16:00AM -0500, visyz@visyz.net wrote:
> > So, I think I'm one of the 3 people in the world who have a Mobile
> > Pentium III (Coppermine).
> 
> I receive more emails on this topics than 'two'...

Pardon the attitude. I was getting a bit angry at my laptop for not
working with your speedstep systems. I didn't mean to come across quite
like i did.

> > Heh. Yeah. anyways. I have an HP Omnibook 4150B, which amounts to the
> > aforementioned coppermine (with speeds from 233-450mhz), on a
> > 440BX/ZX/DX bridge. I tried out the test program to see if it's usable,
> > and while 1 bit did change, it was in GOP 0x0034, not 0x0038. Or maybe
> > that's the other way around. Basically, the one that was supposed to
> > change didn't, and the one that wasn't, did.
> 
> What program?  Mine?  Also are you sure you looked in the web page.
> It's up to the manufacturer to *decide* what GPO to use.  So there
> is *no* possibility to know the correct GPO pin.

The one available at http://www.poupinou.org/cpufreq/
and yes, while I was reading around the website, I got the impression
that the dumped logs were /not/ to be emailed to you directly anymore.

At this point, I'm thinking I mixed up the various cpufreq pages I've
been looking at.

If you're still interested in a fairly old laptop's speedstep, I'll
follow the instructions on your page and send you the results later.

====

Again, I must apologize to you as a group. My manners were forgotten.

~Gibby

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-29 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-29  5:16 Pentium III (Coppermine) cpufreq support visyz
2004-01-29  9:26 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-29  8:50   ` aeriksson2
2004-01-29 11:35     ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29  9:31       ` aeriksson
2004-01-29 12:39         ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29 10:40           ` Anders Eriksson
2004-01-29 14:26             ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29 13:18               ` aeriksson2
2004-01-29 16:10                 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29 10:56   ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29 20:47   ` visyz
2004-01-29 10:50 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-29 20:28   ` visyz [this message]
2004-01-30  9:25     ` Ducrot Bruno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040129202824.GA7866@visyz.net \
    --to=visyz@visyz.net \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ducrot@poupinou.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox