From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>,
cpufreq list <cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: my dothan didn't work with cpufreq...
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:29:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040802202900.GB12724@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1091477873.18905.1.camel@localhost>
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:17:53PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 20:26 +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> > I merged this, but something occurred to me whilst eyeballing
> > the diffs. Rather than duplicating X86_VENDOR_INTEL in every
> > entry of the struct, how about we check it in one place?
> >
> > I'm unaware of any vendor planning to duplicate speedstep,
> > but even if AMD/VIA threw away their current implementations
> > in favour of a bit-for-bit compatible implementation, it
> > wouldn't be hard to add an extra if()
>
> I had the same thought. I already added the vendor check at the top of
> the init function, so in theory nothing else should need to look at it.
>
> So, we can just drop the vendor entries in those tables without having
> to do anything else.
Groovy. I just nuked it in my tree with this patch.
It'll go to Linus with the next batch
If some vendor does clone speedstep, I think it'd be better
done without having to dupe the vendor ID in every entry,
by having per-vendor tables.
Dave
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2004/08/02 21:27:47+01:00 davej@redhat.com
# [CPUFREQ] speedstep-centrino: Remove unnecessary vendor checks.
#
# This is only used on Intel, and if some other vendor ever clones speedstep,
# we can add an additional check in the init routine.
#
# Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
#
# arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
# 2004/08/02 21:27:39+01:00 davej@redhat.com +3 -5
# [CPUFREQ] speedstep-centrino: Remove unnecessary vendor checks.
#
# This is only used on Intel, and if some other vendor ever clones speedstep,
# we can add an additional check in the init routine.
#
# Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
#
diff -Nru a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c 2004-08-02 21:28:42 +01:00
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c 2004-08-02 21:28:42 +01:00
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@
struct cpu_id
{
- __u8 x86_vendor; /* CPU vendor */
__u8 x86; /* CPU family */
__u8 x86_model; /* model */
__u8 x86_mask; /* stepping */
@@ -53,9 +52,9 @@
};
static const struct cpu_id cpu_ids[] = {
- [CPU_BANIAS] = { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 9, 5 },
- [CPU_DOTHAN_A1] = { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 13, 1 },
- [CPU_DOTHAN_B0] = { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, 13, 6 },
+ [CPU_BANIAS] = { 6, 9, 5 },
+ [CPU_DOTHAN_A1] = { 6, 13, 1 },
+ [CPU_DOTHAN_B0] = { 6, 13, 6 },
};
#define N_IDS (sizeof(cpu_ids)/sizeof(cpu_ids[0]))
@@ -265,7 +264,6 @@
static int centrino_verify_cpu_id(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, const struct cpu_id *x)
{
if ((c->x86 == x->x86) &&
- (c->x86_vendor == x->x86_vendor) &&
(c->x86_model == x->x86_model) &&
(c->x86_mask == x->x86_mask))
return 1;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-02 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-12 20:54 my dothan didn't work with cpufreq Damien Marchal
2004-07-13 9:49 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-07-14 10:50 ` Damien Marchal
2004-07-16 8:19 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-07-22 1:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-07-22 6:04 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-07-22 6:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-07-22 9:31 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-07-22 17:34 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-07-23 19:38 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-07-24 1:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-07-24 7:06 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-02 19:26 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-02 20:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-08-02 20:29 ` Dave Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040802202900.GB12724@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox