cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Cc: davej@redhat.com, Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold?
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:39:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050314223945.GC13378@isilmar.linta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42354400.7070500@tremplin-utc.net>

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:57:52AM +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
> BTW, DaveJ, Dominik, I couldn't find them in the daily-snapshot 
> available at codemonkey.org.uk. Should I worry, or is it just due to 
> some latency between your private trees and the public one?

/me has no official position wrt cpufreq core [except userspace
cpufrequtils, but I intend to hand this over to somebody else in the next
few months].

Dave, as maintainer of cpufreq, has a cpufreq bitkeeper tree [http interface
at http://linux-dj.bkbits.net/ ] which is exported as plain diff daily at
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/daily-snapshots/ . This does
not contain your patches yet, probably because he's still busy with other
stuff.

Thanks,
	Dominik

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-14 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-14  7:29 cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Jan De Luyck
2005-03-14  7:57 ` Eric Piel
2005-03-14 11:19   ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-03-14 12:40   ` Jan De Luyck
2005-03-14 22:39   ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2005-05-11  1:33   ` Dave Jones
2005-05-11  2:34     ` Dave Jones
2005-05-11 12:19       ` Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:23         ` [PATCH] [1/3] ondemand governor clean-up Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:27         ` [PATCH][2/3] ondemand governor store the idle ticks for all cpus Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:31         ` [PATCH][3/3] ondemand governor automatic downscaling Eric Piel
2005-05-12 23:16         ` cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Eric Piel
2005-05-17  0:15           ` [PATCH] ondemand,conservative minor bug-fix and cleanup Venkatesh Pallipadi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-11 16:00 cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Pallipadi, Venkatesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050314223945.GC13378@isilmar.linta.de \
    --to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@kcore.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox