From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>,
Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org>,
cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk, linux@dominikbrodowski.net
Subject: Re: cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold?
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 22:34:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050511023448.GA25506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050511013334.GB8039@redhat.com>
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:33:34PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:57:52AM +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
> > Jan De Luyck a écrit :
> > >Hello lists,
> > >
> > >(please cc me from cpufreq list)
> > >
> > >I've since yesterday started using the ondemand governor. Seems to work
> > >fine, tho I can't seem to find a reason why it keeps scaling my processor
> > >speed upwards tho the processor use never exceeds 30% (been watching top
> > >-d 1).
> > :
> > :
> > >Any hints?
> > You can try the three attached patches in the order :
> > ondemand-cleanup-factorise-idle-measurement-2.6.11.patch
> > ondemand-save-idle-up-for-all-cpu-2.6.11.patch
> > ondemand-automatic-downscaling-2.6.11-accepted.patch
> >
> > They are available on the cpufreq list but as it's difficult to access
> > it I'm sending them again, all together. These are the last things that
> > Venki and I have been working on. It should solve your problem
> > (actually, only the last patch, but it depends on the two previous
> > patches). Please, let me know if it works.
> >
> > BTW, DaveJ, Dominik, I couldn't find them in the daily-snapshot
> > available at codemonkey.org.uk. Should I worry, or is it just due to
> > some latency between your private trees and the public one?
>
> I'm preparing the first cpufreq->linus sync right now.
> Can you write up some descriptions & signed-off-by: lines for
> these three please ?
Additionally, it'll need tweaking to diff on top of whats
currently in the pending queue. looks like the patch at
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/pending-patches/CPUFREQ-04-ondemand-cleanups.patch
upsets yours a little.
Thanks,
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-11 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-14 7:29 cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Jan De Luyck
2005-03-14 7:57 ` Eric Piel
2005-03-14 11:19 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-03-14 12:40 ` Jan De Luyck
2005-03-14 22:39 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-05-11 1:33 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-11 2:34 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2005-05-11 12:19 ` Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:23 ` [PATCH] [1/3] ondemand governor clean-up Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH][2/3] ondemand governor store the idle ticks for all cpus Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:31 ` [PATCH][3/3] ondemand governor automatic downscaling Eric Piel
2005-05-12 23:16 ` cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Eric Piel
2005-05-17 0:15 ` [PATCH] ondemand,conservative minor bug-fix and cleanup Venkatesh Pallipadi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-11 16:00 cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050511023448.GA25506@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net \
--cc=cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=lkml@kcore.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox