From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: CPUFreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org>,
davej@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.14] cpufreq: don't suggest speedstep-centrino for Dothan-based Celeron-M processors
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:46:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051204164620.GA8422@isilmar.linta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB60067F424F@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:19:27PM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> I understand acpi_throttle and processor_thermal doing it. But,
> p4-clockmod, meant for cooling should actual run like acpi_throttle and
> get triggered more like throttle rather than powersaving frequency
> drivers. Right?
> Also, if throttling information is not there in ACPI, even then P4
> clockmod can potentially be used as a replacement for acpi_throttle and
> coexist with say acpi-cpufreq.
Yes, exactly. In my TODO list for cpufreq, I still have this entry:
- [core] evaluate use of > 1 drivers at one time (CPUFREQ_THROTTLING,
CPUFREQ_SCALING)
However, as I'm too busy at the moment to tackle this issue, it'd be great
if someone else could handle this one ;)
Thanks,
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-04 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-02 21:19 [PATCH 2.6.14] cpufreq: don't suggest speedstep-centrino for Dothan-based Celeron-M processors Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2005-12-04 16:46 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2005-12-05 11:00 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-12-06 6:01 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-12-06 10:03 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-12-06 10:10 ` Dominik Brodowski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-02 16:58 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2005-12-02 19:29 ` Felix Braun
2005-12-02 21:06 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-12-02 14:26 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2005-12-02 14:52 ` Felix Braun
2005-12-02 15:04 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-12-02 13:57 Felix Braun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051204164620.GA8422@isilmar.linta.de \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=CPUFreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=ducrot@poupinou.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox