cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andras.Horvath@cern.ch
To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Intel Clovertown vs. frequency scaling
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:01:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071012150126.GY6058@cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <653FFBB4508B9042B5D43DC9E18836F5017D897B@scsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com>

> With latest kernels (2.6.22 and beyond) you should use acpi-cpufreq and
> not speedstep-centrino.

ah, thanks. :-) I found that that too was compiled in (and in fact
that's what's driving the Woodcrest box as well).

> The frequencies supported depends on bus speed and voltages supported by
> the CPU. I think the thing here is you have a low voltage part which is
> already running at lowest possible voltage and does not support any more
> frequency/voltage reduction.

Hm. So there are no P* states available (always running at top speed)
but the CPU just goes to some C* state when it's idle?

This looks right (even if I find it strange) as the specs
(http://download.intel.com/design/Xeon/datashts/31556903.pdf ) say that
"Note: Not all Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5300 Series are capable
of supporting Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology. More details on which
processor frequencies will support this feature will be provided in
future releases of the Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5300 Series NDA
Specification Update when available."

Nevertheless http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLAEN
says the L5335 has Enhanced Intel Speedstep support.

> You mentioned that cpufreq works fine on Woodcrest, Intel L5160.
> What are the freqs supported and what is the max freq for this part?

As I said I was mistaken and it's using acpi-cpufreq. However, this:

model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5160  @ 3.00GHz

supports the following frequencies (2.6.23):

# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies 
2997000 2664000 2331000 1998000 


Also, I have found myself another Clovertown:
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5345  @ 2.33GHz

and this seems not to support no frequency scaling, no C-states, only
thermal throttling. Can this be true? From the specs mentioned above I'd
have expected at least some sort of halt state.
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL9YL says 'enhanced
intel speedstep' and C1E support, same as Mr. L5335 above.

I'm getting more and more confused about this :)

Andras

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-12 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-11 15:06 Intel Clovertown vs. frequency scaling Andras.Horvath
2007-10-11 15:25 ` Jarod Wilson
2007-10-11 15:32   ` Stephen J. Gowdy
2007-10-11 15:37     ` Jarod Wilson
2007-10-11 17:15 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-10-12 15:01   ` Andras.Horvath [this message]
2007-10-12 16:44     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-11-02 16:37       ` Andras.Horvath
2007-11-04 23:24         ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071012150126.GY6058@cern.ch \
    --to=andras.horvath@cern.ch \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox