From: Andras.Horvath@cern.ch
To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Intel Clovertown vs. frequency scaling
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:01:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071012150126.GY6058@cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <653FFBB4508B9042B5D43DC9E18836F5017D897B@scsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com>
> With latest kernels (2.6.22 and beyond) you should use acpi-cpufreq and
> not speedstep-centrino.
ah, thanks. :-) I found that that too was compiled in (and in fact
that's what's driving the Woodcrest box as well).
> The frequencies supported depends on bus speed and voltages supported by
> the CPU. I think the thing here is you have a low voltage part which is
> already running at lowest possible voltage and does not support any more
> frequency/voltage reduction.
Hm. So there are no P* states available (always running at top speed)
but the CPU just goes to some C* state when it's idle?
This looks right (even if I find it strange) as the specs
(http://download.intel.com/design/Xeon/datashts/31556903.pdf ) say that
"Note: Not all Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5300 Series are capable
of supporting Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology. More details on which
processor frequencies will support this feature will be provided in
future releases of the Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5300 Series NDA
Specification Update when available."
Nevertheless http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLAEN
says the L5335 has Enhanced Intel Speedstep support.
> You mentioned that cpufreq works fine on Woodcrest, Intel L5160.
> What are the freqs supported and what is the max freq for this part?
As I said I was mistaken and it's using acpi-cpufreq. However, this:
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5160 @ 3.00GHz
supports the following frequencies (2.6.23):
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
2997000 2664000 2331000 1998000
Also, I have found myself another Clovertown:
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5345 @ 2.33GHz
and this seems not to support no frequency scaling, no C-states, only
thermal throttling. Can this be true? From the specs mentioned above I'd
have expected at least some sort of halt state.
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL9YL says 'enhanced
intel speedstep' and C1E support, same as Mr. L5335 above.
I'm getting more and more confused about this :)
Andras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-12 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-11 15:06 Intel Clovertown vs. frequency scaling Andras.Horvath
2007-10-11 15:25 ` Jarod Wilson
2007-10-11 15:32 ` Stephen J. Gowdy
2007-10-11 15:37 ` Jarod Wilson
2007-10-11 17:15 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-10-12 15:01 ` Andras.Horvath [this message]
2007-10-12 16:44 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-11-02 16:37 ` Andras.Horvath
2007-11-04 23:24 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071012150126.GY6058@cern.ch \
--to=andras.horvath@cern.ch \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox