From: Andras.Horvath@cern.ch
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Intel Clovertown vs. frequency scaling
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:37:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071102163702.GE5966@cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <653FFBB4508B9042B5D43DC9E18836F50181D939@scsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com>
(sorry for the late reply)
> Hmmm. This processor should support 2GHz frequency. Most probably BIOS
> is not providing information for the driver to enable speedstep here.
This is embarassing, the option (named "EIST support") was off. Turning
it on resulted in
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
2333000 2000000
but no C-state info (like on the L5335) with 2.6.23 and acpi-cpufreq.
> Can you make sure you have the latest BIOS and also check whether there
> are any options to enable speedstep in BIOS setup. Send me the output of
> acpidump (you can find acpidump in latest pmtools package here -
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/ ). I can
> take a look at what BIOS is saying about speedstep.
Hm... I may be missing something again, but acpidump doesn't find the
RSD PTR table, and dmesg doesn't help either (all ACPI-related options
are enabled in the BIOS):
root@pcitfiot05:/usr/src/pmtools-20070714/acpidump# ./acpidump
ACPI tables were not found. If you know location of RSD PTR table (from
dmesg, etc), supply it with either --addr or -a option
root@pcitfiot05:/usr/src/pmtools-20070714/acpidump# dmesg | grep ACPI | head -20
BIOS-e820: 00000000cff60000 - 00000000cff69000 (ACPI data)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cff69000 - 00000000cff80000 (ACPI NVS)
ACPI: RSDP 000F6030, 0014 (r0 PTLTD )
ACPI: RSDT CFF63C39, 003C (r1 PTLTD RSDT 6040000 LTP 0)
ACPI: FACP CFF68E10, 0074 (r1 INTEL TUMWATER 6040000 PTL 3)
ACPI: DSDT CFF65C59, 31B7 (r1 Intel BLAKFORD 6040000 MSFT 100000E)
ACPI: FACS CFF69FC0, 0040
ACPI: APIC CFF68E84, 00C8 (r1 PTLTD APIC 6040000 LTP 0)
ACPI: MCFG CFF68F4C, 003C (r1 PTLTD MCFG 6040000 LTP 0)
ACPI: BOOT CFF68F88, 0028 (r1 PTLTD $SBFTBL$ 6040000 LTP 1)
ACPI: SPCR CFF68FB0, 0050 (r1 PTLTD $UCRTBL$ 6040000 PTL 1)
ACPI: SSDT CFF63C75, 1405 (r1 PmRef CpuPm 3000 INTL 20050228)
ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x1008
ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x04] enabled)
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled)
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x05] enabled)
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x02] enabled)
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x05] lapic_id[0x06] enabled)
This is with the latest BIOS (Supermicro X7DBT, 1.3c); it has an option
called "Processor Power Management" which can be set to either
"GV1/GV3 only" - according to the BIOS, this enables GV1/GV3 (whatever
that is) but no C states. This is what I use.
"Disabled" - which disables everything.
According to the BIOS help there should be two more settings to that
that give me C states but those are only described, they don't appear in
the selection box.
Two more options called "Thermal Management 2" and "C1 Enhanced Mode"
were also enabled, still no C states.
I guess I'll be nagging Supermicro about this.
thanks again,
Andras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-02 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-11 15:06 Intel Clovertown vs. frequency scaling Andras.Horvath
2007-10-11 15:25 ` Jarod Wilson
2007-10-11 15:32 ` Stephen J. Gowdy
2007-10-11 15:37 ` Jarod Wilson
2007-10-11 17:15 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-10-12 15:01 ` Andras.Horvath
2007-10-12 16:44 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-11-02 16:37 ` Andras.Horvath [this message]
2007-11-04 23:24 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071102163702.GE5966@cern.ch \
--to=andras.horvath@cern.ch \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox