From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Rename cpufrequtils into cpupowerutils and provide some basic cpuidle functionality
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:06:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009281306.28835.trenn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100925123710.GA29610@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
On Saturday 25 September 2010 14:37:10 Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 05:30:06PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > here my latest patchset.
>
> Thanks.
Thank you!
> > If this isn't totally wrong, I'd appreciate if you could
> > push these already (into a separate branch for now?)
>
> Applied into the "cpupowerutils" branch, and pushed that to
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/cpufreq/cpufrequtils.git
>
> I split up one patch into two parts, and added two patches on top. Let me
> know what you think about this.
Absolutely fine.
I packaged cpupowerutils, this time with a proper split of library
and devel packages.
I then got these packages:
cpupowerutils
cpupowerutils-bench
libcpupower0
libcpupower-devel
and the obsolete one (should get removed as soon as
no app is linking against -lcpufreq anymore):
libcpufreq0
Whoever wants to have a look or try out these packages,
they can be found here, built against all kind of SUSE distros
(Factory, 11.3, 11.2, 11.1, SLE_11, SLE11_SP1 - x86_64 and i386):
http://software.opensuse.org/search?q=cpupower
I found some minor bugs/enhancements, will post them in a minute.
Comments, suggestions, etc. are very welcome.
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-23 15:30 Rename cpufrequtils into cpupowerutils and provide some basic cpuidle functionality Thomas Renninger
2010-09-23 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpufrequtils: Prepare for non-cpufreq related power features by renaming files Thomas Renninger
2010-09-23 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpufrequtils: Add cpuidle-info tool with some cstate library functions Thomas Renninger
2010-09-23 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpufrequtils: Rename libcpufreq to libcpupower Thomas Renninger
2010-09-23 15:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpufrequtils: Rename the project/package into cpupowerutils Thomas Renninger
2010-09-25 12:37 ` Rename cpufrequtils into cpupowerutils and provide some basic cpuidle functionality Dominik Brodowski
2010-09-28 11:06 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2010-09-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpupowerutuils: Jump to version 010 Thomas Renninger
2010-10-02 10:34 ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-09-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpupowerutils: Use sbindir for binaries that need root privileges Thomas Renninger
2010-10-02 10:35 ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-09-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpupowerutils: cpufreq-bench must link against libcpupower Thomas Renninger
2010-10-02 10:36 ` Dominik Brodowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009281306.28835.trenn@suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox