* [Bug 19672] New: ondemand is slow
@ 2010-10-03 21:08 bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-24 13:01 ` [Bug 19672] " bugzilla-daemon
2011-01-24 13:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-10-03 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19672
Summary: ondemand is slow
Product: Power Management
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.35
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: cpufreq
AssignedTo: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
ReportedBy: danielhollocher@gmail.com
Regression: No
I find ondemand is allot slower than conservative for cpu bound tasks. My
understanding is that performance wise, ondemand should be on par or slightly
faster than conservative.
My chip is an intel core 2 duo, I think 4300. I am using 2.6.35 from Ubuntu.
On the kraken benchmark, ondemand completes in 34216.6ms +/- 2.3% where as
conservative completes in 25699.3ms +/- 5.6%
Again, it is my understanding that ondemand should not have this much of a
slowdown.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug 19672] ondemand is slow 2010-10-03 21:08 [Bug 19672] New: ondemand is slow bugzilla-daemon @ 2011-01-24 13:01 ` bugzilla-daemon 2011-01-24 13:01 ` bugzilla-daemon 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2011-01-24 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cpufreq https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19672 Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |florian@mickler.org Resolution| |CODE_FIX --- Comment #1 from Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org> 2011-01-24 13:01:27 --- a fix for this has been merged in .37-rc1: commit 3f78a9f7fcee0e9b44a15f39ac382664e301fad5 Author: David C Niemi <dniemi@verisign.com> Date: Wed Oct 6 16:54:24 2010 -0400 [CPUFREQ] add sampling_down_factor tunable to improve ondemand performance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug 19672] ondemand is slow 2010-10-03 21:08 [Bug 19672] New: ondemand is slow bugzilla-daemon 2011-01-24 13:01 ` [Bug 19672] " bugzilla-daemon @ 2011-01-24 13:01 ` bugzilla-daemon 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2011-01-24 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cpufreq https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19672 Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-24 13:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-10-03 21:08 [Bug 19672] New: ondemand is slow bugzilla-daemon 2011-01-24 13:01 ` [Bug 19672] " bugzilla-daemon 2011-01-24 13:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox