From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() target, context and kdamond dirs
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:25:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616152553.C97A01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616150844.88305-2-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incomplete fix: Missing kobject_del() in sysfs directory creation error paths leads to persistent -EEXIST collisions.
--
commit 1c0329e17860c383f4ab90a119f917db75ecacee
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() target, context and kdamond dirs
On CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE enabled kernel, lack of kobject_del()
could cause directories creation failures due to the name conflicts.
Fix those issues for target, context and kdamond directories by adding
kobject_del() calls.
Fixes: c951cd3b8901 ("mm/damon: implement a minimal stub for sysfs-based DAMON interface")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.18.x
> diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs.c b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> index 2e95e3bac774d..d93f7919c3ca1 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ static void damon_sysfs_targets_rm_dirs(struct damon_sysfs_targets *targets)
>
> for (i = 0; i < targets->nr; i++) {
> damon_sysfs_target_rm_dirs(targets_arr[i]);
> + kobject_del(&targets_arr[i]->kobj);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a regression introduced by this patch, but while you are fixing
the -EEXIST name collisions in the rm_dirs() paths, are the same
kobject_del() calls also needed in the error paths of the corresponding
add_dirs() functions?
For example, in damon_sysfs_targets_add_dirs():
mm/damon/sysfs.c:damon_sysfs_targets_add_dirs() {
...
err = kobject_init_and_add(&target->kobj, ...);
if (err)
goto out;
err = damon_sysfs_target_add_dirs(target);
if (err)
goto out;
...
out:
damon_sysfs_targets_rm_dirs(targets);
kobject_put(&target->kobj);
return err;
}
If damon_sysfs_target_add_dirs() fails, kobject_put() is called without
kobject_del(). Does this result in a lingering directory and a persistent
-EEXIST if the user retries?
Similarly, in mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:damos_sysfs_populate_region_dir():
mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:damos_sysfs_populate_region_dir() {
...
if (kobject_init_and_add(®ion->kobj,
&damon_sysfs_scheme_region_ktype,
&sysfs_regions->kobj, "%d",
sysfs_regions->nr_regions))
goto out;
if (damos_sysfs_region_add_dirs(region, ctx, r))
goto out;
...
sysfs_regions->nr_regions++;
return;
out:
kobject_put(®ion->kobj);
}
If this fails, it returns without incrementing sysfs_regions->nr_regions.
Could the next region processed in the loop then attempt to initialize with
the exact same name string, immediately hitting -EEXIST and breaking the
entire region population loop?
> kobject_put(&targets_arr[i]->kobj);
> }
> targets->nr = 0;
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616150844.88305-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 15:08 [RFC PATCH 0/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() directories that users can create/remove SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() target, context and kdamond dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-17 0:02 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() region dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 0:18 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 0:52 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme region dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 0:43 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme filter dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme quota goal dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 0:55 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme action destination dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 1:07 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() probe filter dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 1:10 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() probe dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 1:11 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-17 1:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() directories that users can create/remove SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616152553.C97A01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox