DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme dirs
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:27:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616152703.04D771F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616150844.88305-4-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incorrect `goto` ladder in `damon_sysfs_scheme_add_dirs` causes an uninitialized pointer dereference and a memory leak of the `stats` kobject.
- [Medium] Missing `kobject_del()` in the `out:` error paths of `*_add_dirs()` loops leads to delayed sysfs directory removal and name collisions.
--

commit a283ef4fe4b682b7b66cf9b57221cb6884b386cc
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme dirs

On CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE enabled kernel, lack of kobject_del()
could cause directories creation failures due to the name conflicts. Fix
those issues for scheme directories by adding kobject_del() calls.

> diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c b/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c
> index 329cfd0bbe9f3..37cf6edb54f17 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c
> @@ -2686,6 +2686,7 @@ void damon_sysfs_schemes_rm_dirs(struct damon_sysfs_schemes *schemes)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < schemes->nr; i++) {
>  		damon_sysfs_scheme_rm_dirs(schemes_arr[i]);
> +		kobject_del(&schemes_arr[i]->kobj);
>  		kobject_put(&schemes_arr[i]->kobj);
>  	}
>  	schemes->nr = 0;

[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since we are fixing delayed
sysfs directory removal here, do we have the same name collision vulnerability
in the error paths of our *_add_dirs() loops?

If kobject_init_and_add() succeeds for a scheme, but damon_sysfs_scheme_add_dirs()
fails, the error path drops the reference without calling kobject_del():

mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:damon_sysfs_schemes_add_dirs() {
    ...
		err = kobject_init_and_add(&scheme->kobj,
				&damon_sysfs_scheme_ktype, &schemes->kobj,
				"%d", i);
		if (err)
			goto out;
		err = damon_sysfs_scheme_add_dirs(scheme);
		if (err)
			goto out;
    ...
out:
	damon_sysfs_schemes_rm_dirs(schemes);
	kobject_put(&scheme->kobj);
	return err;
}

Under CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE, would the delayed kobject_release
callback leave the "%d" directory around temporarily, causing -EEXIST
if the user immediately retries?

The identical pattern appears to exist in damon_sysfs_targets_add_dirs(),
damon_sysfs_contexts_add_dirs(), and damon_sysfs_kdamonds_add_dirs().

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but there appears to be an uninitialized pointer
dereference and a memory leak in the goto ladder of
damon_sysfs_scheme_add_dirs().

If damon_sysfs_scheme_set_tried_regions() fails, we jump to
put_tried_regions_out:

mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:damon_sysfs_scheme_add_dirs() {
    ...
	err = damon_sysfs_scheme_set_stats(scheme);
	if (err)
		goto put_filters_watermarks_quotas_access_pattern_out;
	err = damon_sysfs_scheme_set_tried_regions(scheme);
	if (err)
		goto put_tried_regions_out;
	return 0;

put_tried_regions_out:
	kobject_put(&scheme->tried_regions->kobj);
	scheme->tried_regions = NULL;
put_filters_watermarks_quotas_access_pattern_out:
    ...
}

Because scheme is allocated via kmalloc_obj() (which wraps kmalloc and doesn't
zero memory), and the failing set_tried_regions() doesn't initialize
scheme->tried_regions on error, doesn't scheme->tried_regions contain an
uninitialized value here? Dereferencing it would cause a panic.

Additionally, this jump target falls through to
put_filters_watermarks_quotas_access_pattern_out without ever calling
kobject_put(&scheme->stats->kobj), so wouldn't the successfully allocated
stats kobject be permanently leaked?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616150844.88305-1-sj@kernel.org?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-16 15:08 [RFC PATCH 0/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() directories that users can create/remove SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() target, context and kdamond dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17  0:02     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() region dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17  0:18     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:27   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-17  0:52     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme region dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17  0:43     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme filter dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme quota goal dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17  0:55     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: kobject_del() scheme action destination dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17  1:07     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() probe filter dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17  1:10     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() probe dirs SeongJae Park
2026-06-16 15:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17  1:11     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-17  1:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] mm/damon/sysfs: kobject_del() directories that users can create/remove SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260616152703.04D771F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox