DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.2 13/17] mm/damon/core: remove attrs param from damon_update_region_access_rate()
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 16:14:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260621161456.F23981F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260621155715.87932-14-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unprotected static local variables in access check functions cause cross-thread data races and cross-context access measurement pollution.
--

commit cc8a115fada6e1595d5b8a6c2e994e38ac982a9c
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/core: remove attrs param from damon_update_region_access_rate()

This commit removes the unused attrs parameter from
damon_update_region_access_rate() and updates callers in the core,
physical address, and virtual address monitoring code to match the new
signature.

[ ... ]
> diff --git a/mm/damon/paddr.c b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> index d0598f5f26882..db48ad274b078 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/paddr.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> @@ -93,12 +93,12 @@ static void __damon_pa_check_access(struct damon_region *r,
>  	/* If the region is in the last checked page, reuse the result */
>  	if (ALIGN_DOWN(last_addr, last_folio_sz) ==
>  				ALIGN_DOWN(sampling_addr, last_folio_sz)) {
> -		damon_update_region_access_rate(r, last_accessed, attrs);
> +		damon_update_region_access_rate(r, last_accessed);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does relying on last_accessed here cause
data races when multiple kdamond threads run concurrently?

In __damon_pa_check_access(), last_addr, last_folio_sz, and last_accessed
are defined as static variables. Because they are shared globally across all
concurrent damon contexts without synchronization, multiple kdamond threads
will read and write them simultaneously.

Could this allow one thread to incorrectly reuse a last_accessed result
generated by a completely different thread monitoring a different physical
region, corrupting the measurement accuracy?

>  		return;
>  	}

[ ... ]
> diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> index d271476035641..2e12cc628fea0 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> @@ -503,19 +503,19 @@ static void __damon_va_check_access(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  	static bool last_accessed;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but this static variable shares the
same cross-thread data race issue as the physical address check.

If multiple contexts are monitoring different processes, they will write to
these variables simultaneously.

Does this data race allow one kdamond thread to accidentally reuse the
last_accessed result from another thread, breaking context isolation?

>  
>  	if (!mm) {
> -		damon_update_region_access_rate(r, false, attrs);
> +		damon_update_region_access_rate(r, false);
>  		return;
>  	}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260621155715.87932-1-sj@kernel.org?part=13

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-21 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-21 15:56 [RFC PATCH v1.2 00/17] mm/damon: optimize out nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 01/17] mm/damon: introduce damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 16:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:01     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 02/17] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test damon_mvsum() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 03/17] mm/damon/core: always update ->last_nr_accesses for intervals change SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 16:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:23     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 21:13       ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 04/17] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() in __damos_valid_target() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 05/17] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() for damos region tracing SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 06/17] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() for damo regions SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 07/17] mm/damon/core: remove damon_warn_fix_nr_accesses_corruption() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 08/17] mm/damon/core: remove damon_verify_reset_aggregated() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 16:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:24     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 09/17] mm/damon/core: remove damon_verify_merge_regions_of() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 18:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:35     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 10/17] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: remove nr_accesses_bp setup and tests SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 11/17] selftests/damon/drgn_dump_damon_status: do not dump nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 12/17] mm/damon/core: remove nr_accesses_bp setups and updates SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 18:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:37     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 13/17] mm/damon/core: remove attrs param from damon_update_region_access_rate() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 16:14   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-21 20:40     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 14/17] mm/damonn/paddr: remove attrs param from __damon_pa_check_access() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 16:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:42     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 15/17] mm/damon/vaddr: remove attrs param from __damon_va_check_access() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 16/17] mm/damon/core: remove damon_moving_sum() and its unit test SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 17/17] mm/damon: remove damon_region->nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260621161456.F23981F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox