DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.2 13/17] mm/damon/core: remove attrs param from damon_update_region_access_rate()
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 13:40:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260621204050.10993-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260621161456.F23981F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>

On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 16:14:56 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:

> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> 
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Unprotected static local variables in access check functions cause cross-thread data races and cross-context access measurement pollution.
> --
> 
> commit cc8a115fada6e1595d5b8a6c2e994e38ac982a9c
> Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
> 
> mm/damon/core: remove attrs param from damon_update_region_access_rate()
> 
> This commit removes the unused attrs parameter from
> damon_update_region_access_rate() and updates callers in the core,
> physical address, and virtual address monitoring code to match the new
> signature.
> 
> [ ... ]
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/paddr.c b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> > index d0598f5f26882..db48ad274b078 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/paddr.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> > @@ -93,12 +93,12 @@ static void __damon_pa_check_access(struct damon_region *r,
> >  	/* If the region is in the last checked page, reuse the result */
> >  	if (ALIGN_DOWN(last_addr, last_folio_sz) ==
> >  				ALIGN_DOWN(sampling_addr, last_folio_sz)) {
> > -		damon_update_region_access_rate(r, last_accessed, attrs);
> > +		damon_update_region_access_rate(r, last_accessed);
> 
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but does relying on last_accessed here cause
> data races when multiple kdamond threads run concurrently?
> 
> In __damon_pa_check_access(), last_addr, last_folio_sz, and last_accessed
> are defined as static variables. Because they are shared globally across all
> concurrent damon contexts without synchronization, multiple kdamond threads
> will read and write them simultaneously.
> 
> Could this allow one thread to incorrectly reuse a last_accessed result
> generated by a completely different thread monitoring a different physical
> region, corrupting the measurement accuracy?

Nice finding.  Not a blocker of this patch, though.  I will separatelly work on
this.
> 
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> 
> [ ... ]
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> > index d271476035641..2e12cc628fea0 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> > @@ -503,19 +503,19 @@ static void __damon_va_check_access(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >  	static bool last_accessed;
> 
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but this static variable shares the
> same cross-thread data race issue as the physical address check.
> 
> If multiple contexts are monitoring different processes, they will write to
> these variables simultaneously.
> 
> Does this data race allow one kdamond thread to accidentally reuse the
> last_accessed result from another thread, breaking context isolation?

Ditto.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-21 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-21 15:56 [RFC PATCH v1.2 00/17] mm/damon: optimize out nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 01/17] mm/damon: introduce damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 16:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:01     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 02/17] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test damon_mvsum() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 03/17] mm/damon/core: always update ->last_nr_accesses for intervals change SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 16:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:23     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 21:13       ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 04/17] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() in __damos_valid_target() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 05/17] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() for damos region tracing SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 06/17] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: use damon_nr_accesses_mvsum() for damo regions SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 07/17] mm/damon/core: remove damon_warn_fix_nr_accesses_corruption() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 08/17] mm/damon/core: remove damon_verify_reset_aggregated() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 16:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:24     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 09/17] mm/damon/core: remove damon_verify_merge_regions_of() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 18:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:35     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 10/17] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: remove nr_accesses_bp setup and tests SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 11/17] selftests/damon/drgn_dump_damon_status: do not dump nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 12/17] mm/damon/core: remove nr_accesses_bp setups and updates SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 18:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:37     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 13/17] mm/damon/core: remove attrs param from damon_update_region_access_rate() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 16:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:40     ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 14/17] mm/damonn/paddr: remove attrs param from __damon_pa_check_access() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 16:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-21 20:42     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 15/17] mm/damon/vaddr: remove attrs param from __damon_va_check_access() SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 16/17] mm/damon/core: remove damon_moving_sum() and its unit test SeongJae Park
2026-06-21 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH v1.2 17/17] mm/damon: remove damon_region->nr_accesses_bp SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260621204050.10993-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox