DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiayuan Chen" <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/damon/core: split a fraction of regions when nr_regions exceeds max/2
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:09:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626090915.73D161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626085851.70754-2-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Data race on the globally shared static variable `rotation` causes undefined behavior and inter-context interference.
--

commit 2895b546218b4ccc570b82e50e62f788bac4157b
Author: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>

mm/damon/core: split a fraction of regions when nr_regions exceeds max/2

This commit modifies kdamond_split_regions() to split only a fraction of
regions rather than returning early when nr_regions is above max_nr_regions / 2.
It uses a rotating offset to ensure different regions are picked for splitting
over time as the region count smoothly approaches max_nr_regions.

> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c

[ ... ]

> +/* Split one in every @split_step regions into two, from a rotating offset */
> +static void damon_split_some_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
> +				     unsigned long split_step)
> +{
> +	static unsigned long rotation;
> +	struct damon_target *t;
> +	struct damon_region *r, *next;
> +	unsigned long offset = rotation++ % split_step;

[Severity: Medium]
Will this cause a data race if multiple DAMON contexts are running concurrently?

Since rotation is declared static and locklessly incremented, independent
kdamond worker threads could read and mutate it simultaneously.

This unsynchronized read-modify-write on shared state might trigger automated
data race reports. Additionally, does this mean different contexts will step
on each other's rotation offsets, breaking the intended round-robin behavior
for each individual context?

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260626085851.70754-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-26  8:58 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/damon/core: detect internal variation above max_nr_regions/2 Jiayuan Chen
2026-06-26  8:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/damon/core: split a fraction of regions when nr_regions exceeds max/2 Jiayuan Chen
2026-06-26  9:09   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-26 14:49     ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-26 14:46   ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-26  8:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test split above max_nr_regions/2 Jiayuan Chen
2026-06-26 14:54   ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-26 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/damon/core: detect internal variation " SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260626090915.73D161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox