From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
"Jiayuan Chen" <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/damon/core: split a fraction of regions when nr_regions exceeds max/2
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:49:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626144906.86649-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626090915.73D161F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:09:15 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] Data race on the globally shared static variable `rotation` causes undefined behavior and inter-context interference.
> --
>
> commit 2895b546218b4ccc570b82e50e62f788bac4157b
> Author: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
>
> mm/damon/core: split a fraction of regions when nr_regions exceeds max/2
>
> This commit modifies kdamond_split_regions() to split only a fraction of
> regions rather than returning early when nr_regions is above max_nr_regions / 2.
> It uses a rotating offset to ensure different regions are picked for splitting
> over time as the region count smoothly approaches max_nr_regions.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > +/* Split one in every @split_step regions into two, from a rotating offset */
> > +static void damon_split_some_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
> > + unsigned long split_step)
> > +{
> > + static unsigned long rotation;
> > + struct damon_target *t;
> > + struct damon_region *r, *next;
> > + unsigned long offset = rotation++ % split_step;
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Will this cause a data race if multiple DAMON contexts are running concurrently?
>
> Since rotation is declared static and locklessly incremented, independent
> kdamond worker threads could read and mutate it simultaneously.
>
> This unsynchronized read-modify-write on shared state might trigger automated
> data race reports. Additionally, does this mean different contexts will step
> on each other's rotation offsets, breaking the intended round-robin behavior
> for each individual context?
I don't think this matters. We don't really need strict round-robin but a
level of fairness. Let me know if I'm wrong.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 8:58 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/damon/core: detect internal variation above max_nr_regions/2 Jiayuan Chen
2026-06-26 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/damon/core: split a fraction of regions when nr_regions exceeds max/2 Jiayuan Chen
2026-06-26 9:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 14:49 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-06-26 14:46 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-26 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test split above max_nr_regions/2 Jiayuan Chen
2026-06-26 14:54 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-26 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/damon/core: detect internal variation " SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260626144906.86649-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox