From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:35:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710143501.26630-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710140119.C919F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:01:19 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] The apply_probes callback fails to calculate and return the maximum probe hits weighted sum, unconditionally returning 0.
> --
>
> --- Patch [4]: [PATCH 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum ---
> commit bb862935a31b8d93d0e79b24c1d5bb92b5faf39a
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum
>
> This commit updates the DAMON operations protocol to allow the apply_probes
> callback to calculate and return the maximum probe hits weighted sum. It
> modifies the function signature to take a return_max_wsum parameter and
> updates the existing implementation in damon_pa_apply_probes() to return
> an unsigned int.
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> > index aee28b05acc6c..e7acd8e610a64 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -649,6 +649,8 @@ enum damon_ops_id {
> > * @apply_probes should apply the data attribute probes to each region and
> > * accordingly update the probe hits counter of the region. It should also
> > * set &damon_region->sampling_addr of each region if ``set_samples`` is true.
> > + * It should also return maximum probe hits weighted sum of regions if
> > + * ``return_max_wsum`` is true.
> > * @get_scheme_score should return the priority score of a region for a scheme
> > * as an integer in [0, &DAMOS_MAX_SCORE].
> > * @apply_scheme is called from @kdamond when a region for user provided
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/paddr.c b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> > index ff4fcca949660..3eba3564a31fc 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/paddr.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static bool damon_pa_filter_pass(phys_addr_t pa, struct folio *folio,
> > return pass;
> > }
> >
> > -static void damon_pa_apply_probes(struct damon_ctx *ctx, bool set_samples)
> > +static unsigned int damon_pa_apply_probes(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
> > + bool set_samples, bool return_max_wsum)
> > {
> > struct damon_target *t;
> > struct damon_region *r;
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ static void damon_pa_apply_probes(struct damon_ctx *ctx, bool set_samples)
> > folio_put(folio);
> > }
> > }
> > + return 0;
> > }
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Will this unconditionally return 0 even when return_max_wsum is true?
>
> The struct documentation states the callback should return the maximum probe
> hits weighted sum of regions if return_max_wsum is true. However, the
> implementation in damon_pa_apply_probes() simply returns 0 at the end
> without computing the weighted sum.
>
> Should the maximum weighted sum calculation be implemented here to fulfill
> the updated protocol?
No issue. No caller sets return_max_wsum true at this moment.
And a later patch in this series will make the argument be respected before
someone sets it true.
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260710134651.18084-1-sj@kernel.org?part=4
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 13:46 [PATCH 00/19] mm/damon: introduce data attributes only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 01/19] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_probe->weight SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 02/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probes() ops callback to set sampling address SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:32 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 03/19] mm/damon/paddr: set samples in apply_probes() if requested SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:33 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:35 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 05/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_probe_hits_wsum() SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 06/19] mm/damon/paddr: respect return_max_wsum SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 07/19] mm/damon/core: use abs_diff() instead of abs() SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:43 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 08/19] mm/damon/core: extend merge function to work with probe hits SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:49 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 09/19] mm/damon/core: disallow probe_hits overflow on attrs only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:51 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 11/19] mm/damon/core: disable access monitoring when probe weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 12/19] mm/damon/core: set samples in apply_probes() if " SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:52 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 13/19] mm/damon/core: s/max_nr_accesses/max_merge_score/ in kdamond_fn() SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:54 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 15/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_has_probe_weight() SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:55 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 16/19] mm/damon/sysfs: implement probe/weight file SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 17/19] Docs/mm/damon/design: document attrs-only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 18/19] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: document weight sysfs file SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 19/19] Docs/ABI/damon: document probe weight file SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:59 ` [PATCH 00/19] mm/damon: introduce data attributes only monitoring SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710143501.26630-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox