From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_has_probe_weight()
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:55:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710145530.27524-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710141100.AADA91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:11:00 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] Setting probe weights unconditionally disables access checks without validating if the active operation set supports data attribute probes (`apply_probes`), silently breaking monitoring.
> --
>
> --- Patch [15]: [PATCH 15/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_has_probe_weight() ---
> commit 7b3dfd9b2d27b35cdf18598b48bc4927675cb47a
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/core: implement damon_has_probe_weight()
>
> This commit updates damon_has_probe_weights() to properly iterate over the
> probes and return true if any probe has a weight configured. This enables the
> data attribute monitoring mode that previously returned false intentionally
> during incremental development.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> > index 91964336ce31e..806a67d02a6e9 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> > @@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ static struct damon_probe *damon_nth_probe(int n, struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> >
> > static bool damon_has_probe_weights(struct damon_ctx *c)
> > {
> > + struct damon_probe *p;
> > +
> > + damon_for_each_probe(p, c) {
> > + if (p->weight)
> > + return true;
> > + }
>
> [Severity: High]
> If a user configures a DAMON context with an operation set that does not
> implement apply_probes (e.g. vaddr operations) and adds a probe with a
> non-zero weight, will this silently break monitoring?
>
> With this change, damon_has_probe_weights() returning true will skip
> standard access monitoring in kdamond_fn():
>
> mm/damon/core.c:kdamond_fn() {
> ...
> bool access_check_disabled = damon_has_probe_weights(ctx);
> unsigned int max_merge_score = 0;
> ...
> if (!access_check_disabled && ctx->ops.check_accesses)
> max_merge_score = ctx->ops.check_accesses(ctx);
>
> if (ctx->ops.apply_probes) {
> /* bypassed if apply_probes is not implemented */
> ...
> }
> ...
> /* max_merge_score remains 0 */
> if (time_after_eq(ctx->passed_sample_intervals,
> next_aggregation_sis)) {
> kdamond_merge_regions(ctx, max_merge_score / 10, sz_limit);
> ...
> }
>
> Should damon_valid_probe_params() or damon_has_probe_weights() also verify
> that ctx->ops.apply_probes is implemented before allowing this mode, to
> prevent kdamond_merge_regions() from unconditionally merging regions with
> a threshold of 0?
No issue. This is an intentional behavior.
>
> > return false;
> > }
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260710134651.18084-1-sj@kernel.org?part=15
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 13:46 [PATCH 00/19] mm/damon: introduce data attributes only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 01/19] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_probe->weight SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 02/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probes() ops callback to set sampling address SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:32 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 03/19] mm/damon/paddr: set samples in apply_probes() if requested SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:33 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 04/19] mm/damon/core: ask apply_probe() to return max probe hits weighted sum SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:35 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 05/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_probe_hits_wsum() SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 06/19] mm/damon/paddr: respect return_max_wsum SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 07/19] mm/damon/core: use abs_diff() instead of abs() SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:43 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 08/19] mm/damon/core: extend merge function to work with probe hits SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:49 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 09/19] mm/damon/core: disallow probe_hits overflow on attrs only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 10/19] mm/damon/core: validate params for probe hits weighted sum overflow SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:51 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 11/19] mm/damon/core: disable access monitoring when probe weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 12/19] mm/damon/core: set samples in apply_probes() if " SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:52 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 13/19] mm/damon/core: s/max_nr_accesses/max_merge_score/ in kdamond_fn() SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 14/19] mm/damon/core: get merge threshold from probe hits when weights are set SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:54 ` SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 15/19] mm/damon/core: implement damon_has_probe_weight() SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 14:55 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 16/19] mm/damon/sysfs: implement probe/weight file SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 17/19] Docs/mm/damon/design: document attrs-only monitoring SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 18/19] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: document weight sysfs file SJ Park
2026-07-10 13:46 ` [PATCH 19/19] Docs/ABI/damon: document probe weight file SJ Park
2026-07-10 14:59 ` [PATCH 00/19] mm/damon: introduce data attributes only monitoring SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710145530.27524-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox