From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm/damon/sysfs: support hugepage_size probe filter
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 17:30:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260913173023.394EF1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260913171133.102366-6-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] Missing bounds validation for hugepage_size filter in damon_sysfs_set_filters().
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Newly created hugepage_size filters lack range bounds initialization in damon_commit_filters(), causing the DAMON core to evaluate folios against uninitialized kernel heap memory.
--
commit 42f3666a978b5b2934ebb23daaee8fd5163c7793
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/damon/sysfs: support hugepage_size probe filter
This commit extends the DAMON sysfs interface to support the hugepage_size
probe filter. It allows users to set hugepage_size via sysfs min/max files
and passes these arguments to the DAMON core.
> diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs.c b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> index 8e8d89b8ed981..43519afb9eb7f 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2273,6 +2277,9 @@ static int damon_sysfs_set_filters(struct damon_probe *probe,
> damon_destroy_filter(filter);
> return err;
> }
> + } else if (filter->type == DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_HUGEPAGE_SIZE) {
> + filter->range_min = sys_filter->range_min;
> + filter->range_max = sys_filter->range_max;
[Severity: Medium]
Are bounds checks needed here to ensure range_min is less than or equal to
range_max?
Because DAMON's initial startup via damon_start() bypasses the bounds check
in damon_commit_filter(), turning DAMON on with inverted bounds in sysfs
silently accepts the configuration. The filter then unconditionally fails to
match any folios, resulting in a silent functional failure instead of an
expected -EINVAL rejection.
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed that newly created
hugepage_size filters lack range bounds initialization in
damon_commit_filters().
If a user configures a new hugepage_size filter via sysfs on an already
running DAMON context and writes 'commit' to the state file, the newly
added filter is allocated without initializing the range:
mm/damon/core.c:damon_commit_filters() {
...
new_filter = damon_new_filter(src_filter->type,
src_filter->matching, src_filter->allow);
if (!new_filter)
return -ENOMEM;
switch (src_filter->type) {
case DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_MEMCG:
new_filter->memcg_id = src_filter->memcg_id;
break;
default:
break;
}
...
}
Because damon_new_filter() allocates memory without zeroing, and the switch
statement explicitly omits DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_HUGEPAGE_SIZE, range_min and
range_max are populated with uninitialized kernel heap memory. Could this
cause the DAMON core to evaluate folios against erratic heap garbage?
> + }
> damon_add_filter(probe, filter);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260913171133.102366-1-sj@kernel.org?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-13 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-13 17:11 [RFC PATCH 0/8] mm/damon: introduce hugepage_size probe filter SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] mm/damon/api: introduce DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_HUGEPAGE_SIZE SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:31 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:40 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm/damon/core: commit hugepage_size type damon filter SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:33 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:41 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] mm/damon/ops-common: support hugepage_size damon filter matching SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:35 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:41 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] mm/damon/sysfs: add min,max files under probe filter directory SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm/damon/sysfs: support hugepage_size probe filter SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-13 17:38 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] Docs/mm/damon/design: update for " SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:42 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: update for hugepage_size SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] Docs/ABI/damon: update for hugepage_size probe filter SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260913173023.394EF1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox