From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: sashiko-bot@kernel.org, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm/damon/core: commit hugepage_size type damon filter
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 10:41:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260913174104.104908-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260913173323.104247-1-sj@kernel.org>
On Sun, 13 Sep 2026 10:33:22 -0700 SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2026 17:24:21 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> > - [High] Missing initialization and validation of `range_min` and `range_max` for newly appended `hugepage_size` filters leads to uninitialized memory usage.
> > --
> >
> > commit 2b0a5f30b2fda9db59b511fc77d64fcbd35378ca
> > Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
> >
> > mm/damon/core: commit hugepage_size type damon filter
> >
> > Extend data attribute probe filters commit logic for the new
> > hugepage_size filter type. Since it needs to carry the size range of
> > the hugepage, update the logic to update the size range fields of the
> > commit destination filter struct.
> >
> > > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> > > index 0c98f7e267d07..a3febdc355c1e 100644
> > > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > @@ -1807,23 +1807,33 @@ static void damon_commit_filter(struct damon_filter *dst,
> > > case DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_MEMCG:
> > > dst->memcg_id = src->memcg_id;
> > > break;
> > > + case DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_HUGEPAGE_SIZE:
> > > + if (src->range_max < src->range_min)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + dst->range_min = src->range_min;
> > > + dst->range_max = src->range_max;
> > > + break;
> > > default:
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > + return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int damon_commit_filters(struct damon_probe *dst,
> > > struct damon_probe *src)
> > > {
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > damon_for_each_filter_safe(src_filter, next, src) {
> > > if (j++ < i)
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > new_filter = damon_new_filter(src_filter->type,
> > > src_filter->matching, src_filter->allow);
> > > if (!new_filter)
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > switch (src_filter->type) {
> > > case DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_MEMCG:
> > > new_filter->memcg_id = src_filter->memcg_id;
> > > break;
> > > default:
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > damon_add_filter(dst, new_filter);
> >
> > [Severity: High]
> > Does this code leave range_min and range_max uninitialized for newly
> > appended hugepage_size filters?
> >
> > If a user writes a new hugepage_size filter to a running probe via sysfs,
> > it triggers the filter appending path here:
> > damon_commit_ctx() -> damon_commit_probes() -> damon_commit_filters()
> >
> > When the new filter is appended, damon_new_filter() allocates memory with
> > kmalloc(), which does not zero-initialize the memory. The switch statement
> > then omits copying range_min and range_max for
> > DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_HUGEPAGE_SIZE, leaving them as uninitialized heap garbage.
> >
> > This makes the hugepage_size filter unpredictable and could cause incorrect
> > memory pages to be filtered in or out. It also completely bypasses the
> > validation logic added for existing filters in damon_commit_filter().
>
> DAMON sysfs is not allowing hugepage_size filter at the moment, so this issue
> cannot happen. A later patch of this series will add the support with correct
> range setup.
I was wrong. I will fix this in the next spin.
>
> >
> > --
> > Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260913171133.102366-1-sj@kernel.org?part=2
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-13 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-13 17:11 [RFC PATCH 0/8] mm/damon: introduce hugepage_size probe filter SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] mm/damon/api: introduce DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_HUGEPAGE_SIZE SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:31 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:40 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm/damon/core: commit hugepage_size type damon filter SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:33 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:41 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] mm/damon/ops-common: support hugepage_size damon filter matching SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:35 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:41 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] mm/damon/sysfs: add min,max files under probe filter directory SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm/damon/sysfs: support hugepage_size probe filter SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:38 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] Docs/mm/damon/design: update for " SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:42 ` SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: update for hugepage_size SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] Docs/ABI/damon: update for hugepage_size probe filter SJ Park
2026-09-13 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260913174104.104908-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox