From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6.y] mm/damon/core: fix unconditionally skip last region
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 09:54:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930095442.264EF1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930093707.48739-1-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm: invalid list head dereference if damon_split_region_at() fails
- [Medium] mm: scheme state leak due to early return for small last region
--
commit ae1e4dc8429f6a152575d9c64a1876f9dfb3b7ad
Author: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
mm/damon/core: fix unconditionally skip last region
This commit modifies damos_skip_charged_region() to only reset the charge
state when the last region is reached. It ensures the last region is skipped
only when it is applied or cannot be split.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260908134739.96919-1-sj@kernel.org
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 0713fda22682c..5ede1733369f5 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
[ ... ]
> if (quota->charge_addr_from && r->ar.start <
> quota->charge_addr_from) {
> sz_to_skip = ALIGN_DOWN(quota->charge_addr_from -
> r->ar.start, DAMON_MIN_REGION);
> if (!sz_to_skip) {
> if (damon_sz_region(r) <= DAMON_MIN_REGION)
> return true;
[Severity: Medium]
Does this early return for a small last region bypass the state clearing at
the relocated out label?
If damos_skip_charged_region() processes the last region in a target and it
is smaller than DAMON_MIN_REGION, the code executes return true early. This
bypasses the out block that clears quota->charge_target_from.
In the subsequent window, the scheme could again skip all targets until the
saved target, evaluate its last region, and hit the same early return,
potentially skipping targets endlessly across windows.
> sz_to_skip = DAMON_MIN_REGION;
> }
> damon_split_region_at(t, r, sz_to_skip);
> r = damon_next_region(r);
> *rp = r;
[Severity: High]
Can unconditionally advancing the region pointer after a potentially failed
split on the last element cause list head type confusion?
When damos_skip_charged_region() processes the last region of a target and
attempts to split it, it calls damon_split_region_at(). If the split fails
due to a memory allocation failure, the region is not split and remains the
last element in the list.
The subsequent call:
r = damon_next_region(r);
will dereference r->list.next, which points to the list head
(&t->regions_list), returning a type-confused pointer.
Passing this bogus pointer back via *rp = r means that subsequent calls to
damos_valid_target() and damos_apply_scheme() will dereference it, which
could lead to a heap out-of-bounds access.
> + skip = false;
> }
> + }
> +out:
> + if (r == damon_last_region(t)) {
> quota->charge_target_from = NULL;
> quota->charge_addr_from = 0;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260930093707.48739-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2026092948-moonrise-persecute-3597@gregkh>
2026-09-30 9:37 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] mm/damon/core: fix unconditionally skip last region SJ Park
2026-09-30 9:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-30 10:06 ` SJ Park
2026-09-30 10:08 ` SJ Park
2026-09-30 10:18 ` [PATCH 6.6.y v2] " SJ Park
2026-09-30 10:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 10:35 ` SJ Park
2026-10-02 14:19 ` Sasha Levin
2026-10-02 18:03 ` SJ Park
2026-10-09 13:49 ` [PATCH 6.6.y v3 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix last region handling of damos_skip_charged_regions() SJ Park
2026-10-09 13:49 ` [PATCH 6.6.y v3 1/2] mm/damon/core: do non-safe region walk on kdamond_apply_schemes() SJ Park
2026-10-09 14:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 14:07 ` SJ Park
2026-10-09 13:49 ` [PATCH 6.6.y v3 2/2] mm/damon/core: fix unconditionally skip last region SJ Park
2026-10-09 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 14:08 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930095442.264EF1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).