DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6.y v3 1/2] mm/damon/core: do non-safe region walk on kdamond_apply_schemes()
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 14:02:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-165685@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009134949.11507-2-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] mm: damon: double processing of split regions by earlier schemes
--

commit de615e5101d6a41f308fef487cc464f7d25abb6e
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/core: do non-safe region walk on kdamond_apply_schemes()

This commit replaces the safe region iterator with damon_for_each_region()
in kdamond_apply_schemes() to ensure newly split regions are not ignored
during iteration. It also simplifies damos_skip_charged_region() by
removing a workaround that updated the region pointer directly.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260227170623.95384-3-sj@kernel.org

> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index fe91b296f4c66..c86cac855b9b0 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ static void damos_adjust_quota(struct damon_ctx *c, struct damos *s)
>  static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
>  {
>  	struct damon_target *t;
> -	struct damon_region *r, *next_r;
> +	struct damon_region *r;
>  	struct damos *s;
>  	unsigned long sample_interval = c->attrs.sample_interval ?
>  		c->attrs.sample_interval : 1;
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
>  		return;
>  
>  	damon_for_each_target(t, c) {
> -		damon_for_each_region_safe(r, next_r, t)
> +		damon_for_each_region(r, t)
>  			damon_do_apply_schemes(c, t, r);

[Severity: Medium]
Will this change cause earlier schemes to re-process newly split regions?

When damon_do_apply_schemes() evaluates a region, it sequentially iterates
through all schemes. If an earlier scheme processes the region, it applies
its action and updates its quota.

If a later scheme then hits an address filter or quota while evaluating the
same region, it splits the region, shrinking it and inserting a new remainder
region immediately after it in the target list.

Because the outer loop now dynamically fetches the next region via
damon_for_each_region(), this newly inserted remainder region is evaluated
in the very next iteration.

When damon_do_apply_schemes() processes this remainder region, it starts over
from the first scheme. Won't this cause the earlier scheme to re-evaluate
and apply its action a second time, potentially artificially double-charging
its quota and redundantly applying physical memory operations?

>  	}
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261009134949.11507-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2026092948-moonrise-persecute-3597@gregkh>
2026-09-30  9:37 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] mm/damon/core: fix unconditionally skip last region SJ Park
2026-09-30  9:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 10:06     ` SJ Park
2026-09-30 10:08   ` SJ Park
2026-09-30 10:18 ` [PATCH 6.6.y v2] " SJ Park
2026-09-30 10:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 10:35     ` SJ Park
2026-10-02 14:19   ` Sasha Levin
2026-10-02 18:03     ` SJ Park
2026-10-09 13:49 ` [PATCH 6.6.y v3 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix last region handling of damos_skip_charged_regions() SJ Park
2026-10-09 13:49   ` [PATCH 6.6.y v3 1/2] mm/damon/core: do non-safe region walk on kdamond_apply_schemes() SJ Park
2026-10-09 14:02     ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-09 14:07       ` SJ Park
2026-10-09 13:49   ` [PATCH 6.6.y v3 2/2] mm/damon/core: fix unconditionally skip last region SJ Park
2026-10-09 14:05     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 14:08       ` SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-165685@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox