From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Suhaas Joshi <suhaas@s-joshi.in>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, aethernet65535@gmail.com,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/damon/core: Use only installed probe in damon_merge_two_regions()
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 00:43:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009074349.40812-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008151944.113714-2-suhaas@s-joshi.in>
Hello Suhaas,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2026 20:49:25 +0530 Suhaas Joshi <suhaas@s-joshi.in> wrote:
> While merging 2 regions, we iterate over the entire probe_hits[] array,
> whose size is determined by the DAMON_MAX_PROBES macro. However, it is
> possible that we have fewer probes installed than DAMON_MAX_PROBES. In such
> cases, we end up making redundant iterations. Therefore, to remedy this,
> iterate over the list of installed probes instead of iterating over the
> entire array. For doing this, start accepting a struct damon_ctx in
> damon_merge_two_regions(), and update calling functions to pass this
> argument.
>
> Update the damon_test_merge_two() test to use this new signature for
> damon_merge_two_regions() as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suhaas Joshi <suhaas@s-joshi.in>
> ---
> mm/damon/core.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index b63e60ef8990..fc202f90991b 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -3524,20 +3524,26 @@ static void damon_verify_merge_two_regions(
> /*
> * Merge two adjacent regions into one region
> */
> -static void damon_merge_two_regions(struct damon_target *t,
> - struct damon_region *l, struct damon_region *r)
> +static void damon_merge_two_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
> + struct damon_target *t,
> + struct damon_region *l,
> + struct damon_region *r)
Please use two tabs for indentation of the second and next lines of function
parameters. For example:
'''
@@ -3739,8 +3739,9 @@ static noinline_for_stack void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_DEBUG_SANITY
-static void damon_verify_merge_two_regions(
- struct damon_region *l, struct damon_region *r)
+static void damon_verify_merge_two_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
+ struct damon_target *t, struct damon_region *l,
+ struct damon_region *r)
{
/* damon_merge_two_regions() may created incorrect left region */
WARN_ONCE(l->ar.start >= l->ar.end, "l: %lu-%lu, r: %lu-%lu\n",
'''
> {
> unsigned long sz_l = damon_sz_region(l), sz_r = damon_sz_region(r);
> int i;
> + struct damon_probe *p;
>
> l->nr_accesses = (l->nr_accesses * sz_l + r->nr_accesses * sz_r) /
> (sz_l + sz_r);
> l->age = (l->age * sz_l + r->age * sz_r) / (sz_l + sz_r);
> l->ar.end = r->ar.end;
> - /* todo: do this for only installed probes */
> - for (i = 0; i < DAMON_MAX_PROBES; i++)
> +
> + i = 0;
> + damon_for_each_probe(p, ctx) {
> l->probe_hits[i] = (l->probe_hits[i] * sz_l + r->probe_hits[i]
> * sz_r) / (sz_l + sz_r);
> + ++i;
> + }
> damon_verify_merge_two_regions(l, r);
> damon_destroy_region(r, t);
> }
> @@ -3590,7 +3596,7 @@ static void damon_merge_regions_of(struct damon_target *t, unsigned int thres,
> goto set_prev_continue;
> if (damon_sz_region(prev) + damon_sz_region(r) > sz_limit)
> goto set_prev_continue;
> - damon_merge_two_regions(t, prev, r);
> + damon_merge_two_regions(ctx, t, prev, r);
> continue;
> set_prev_continue:
> prev = r;
> diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> index ef146ca2ae8a..4e380c6c5eb2 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> @@ -182,13 +182,27 @@ static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct damon_target *t;
> struct damon_region *r, *r2, *r3;
> + struct damon_probe *p;
> + struct damon_ctx *ctx;
> int i;
>
> + p = damon_new_probe();
> + if (!p)
> + kunit_skip(test, "probe alloc fail");
> + ctx = damon_new_ctx();
> + if (!ctx) {
> + damon_destroy_probe(p);
> + kunit_skip(test, "context alloc fail");
> + }
> + damon_add_probe(ctx, p);
> t = damon_new_target();
> - if (!t)
> + if (!t) {
> + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
> kunit_skip(test, "target alloc fail");
> + }
> r = damon_new_region(0, 100);
> if (!r) {
> + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
> damon_free_target(t);
> kunit_skip(test, "region alloc fail");
> }
> @@ -198,6 +212,7 @@ static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test)
> damon_add_region(r, t);
> r2 = damon_new_region(100, 300);
> if (!r2) {
> + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
> damon_free_target(t);
> kunit_skip(test, "second region alloc fail");
> }
> @@ -206,7 +221,7 @@ static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test)
> r2->age = 21;
> damon_add_region(r2, t);
Let's allocate and setup 'ctx' and 'p' here. That will reduce alloc failure
handling code. Also add 't' to 'ctx'. That will let us to remove
damon_free_target() call from the final cleanup.
>
> - damon_merge_two_regions(t, r, r2);
> + damon_merge_two_regions(ctx, t, r, r2);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 0ul);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 300ul);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->nr_accesses, 16u);
> @@ -220,6 +235,7 @@ static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test)
> }
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 1);
>
> + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
> damon_free_target(t);
> }
>
> --
> 2.55.0
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20261008151944.113714-1-suhaas@s-joshi.in>
2026-10-08 15:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/damon/core: Use only installed probe in damon_merge_two_regions() Suhaas Joshi
2026-10-08 15:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 15:33 ` Suhaas Joshi
2026-10-09 7:46 ` SJ Park
2026-10-09 7:43 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-10-08 15:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/damon/core: Copy only installed probe in damon_split_region_at() Suhaas Joshi
2026-10-08 15:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 2:40 ` kernel test robot
2026-10-09 8:21 ` SJ Park
2026-10-09 15:43 ` Suhaas Joshi
2026-10-09 4:06 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261009074349.40812-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=suhaas@s-joshi.in \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox