DCCP protocol discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:35:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180801103537.d36t3snzulyuge7g@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3b48104-3efb-1896-0d46-792419f49a75@virtuozzo.com>

Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> Still can't grasp all details.
> There is state that we read without taking ct->ct_general.use ref
> first, namely ct->state and what's used by nf_ct_key_equal.
> So let's say the entry we want to find is in the list, but
> ____nf_conntrack_find finds a wrong entry earlier because all state it
> looks at is random garbage, so it returns the wrong entry to
> __nf_conntrack_find_get.

If an entry can be found, it can't be random garbage.
We never link entries into global table until state has been set up.

> Now (nf_ct_is_dying(ct) || !atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use))
> check in __nf_conntrack_find_get passes, and it returns NULL to the
> caller (which means entry is not present).

So entry is going away or marked as dead which for us is same as
'not present', we need to allocate a new entry.

> While in reality the entry
> is present, but we were just looking at the wrong one.

We never add tuples that are identical to the global table.

If N cores receive identical packets at same time with no prior state, all
will allocate a new conntrack, but we notice this when we try to insert the
nf_conn entries into the table.

Only one will succeed, other cpus have to cope with this.
(worst case: all raced packets are dropped along with their conntrack
 object).

For lookup, we have following scenarios:

1. It doesn't exist -> new allocation needed
2. It exists, not dead, has nonzero refount -> use it
3. It exists, but marked as dying -> new allocation needed
4. It exists but has 0 reference count -> new allocation needed
5. It exists, we get reference, but 2nd nf_ct_key_equal check
   fails.  We saw a matching 'old incarnation' that just got
   re-used on other core.  -> retry lookup

> Also I am not sure about order of checks in (nf_ct_is_dying(ct) ||
> !atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)), because checking state
> before taking the ref is only a best-effort hint, so it can actually
> be a dying entry when we take a ref.

Yes, it can also become a dying entry after we took the reference.
 
> So shouldn't it read something like the following?
> 
>         rcu_read_lock();
> begin:
>         h = ____nf_conntrack_find(net, zone, tuple, hash);
>         if (h) {
>                 ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
>                 if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use))
>                         goto begin;
>                 if (unlikely(nf_ct_is_dying(ct)) ||
>                     unlikely(!nf_ct_key_equal(h, tuple, zone, net))) {
>                         nf_ct_put(ct);

It would be ok to make this change, but dying bit can be set
at any time e.g. because userspace tells kernel to flush the conntrack table.
So refcount is always > 0 when the DYING bit is set.

I don't see why it would be a problem.

nf_conn struct will stay valid until all cpus have dropped references.
The check in lookup function only serves to hide the known-to-go-away entry.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-01 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-31 17:01 SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementatio Andrey Ryabinin
2018-07-31 17:09 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Florian Westphal
2018-07-31 17:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:36 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-07-31 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-31 17:51 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-31 18:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-01  8:46 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01  9:03 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2018-08-01  9:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 10:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 10:34 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 10:35 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2018-08-01 10:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 11:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 11:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 11:40 ` Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 12:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 13:46 ` Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 13:52 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 15:15 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-08-01 15:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 15:53 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 16:22 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-08-01 16:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 16:47 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 17:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-06 20:20 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180801103537.d36t3snzulyuge7g@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox