From: Arno Wagner <arno@wagner.name>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] cryptsetup, LUKS, plausible deniability
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:22:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090912222223.GA23233@tansi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090912215345.GA8666@alpha2>
I think this is the wrong approach. LUKS is not designed to hide
at all and trying to make it capable of doing so is very likely
a lot harder than to use something else, esoecially as several
solutions are already available.
Incidentially, using plain dm-crypt with a single zero-overwrite
of the decrypted device already works very well. I, for example,
use plain dm-crypt with a random key and zero overwrite to
erase devices and partitions. This is indistinguishable from
a denied encrypted volume. It is not feasible to hide the
encrypted data istelf, so this is as far as it goes.
If you want more, use TrueCrypt, but I would be very careful
with plausible deniablility anyways. Your protection is primarily
that they cannot force you to give up your keys. If you live
in a country were they can, I propose to very seriously consider
leaving that country for good. See also http://xkcd.com/538/
This _is_ realistic.
Arno
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:53:45PM +0200, Ivan Stankovic wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion about plausible deniability for LUKS (see
> http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/issues/detail?id=7).
>
> As has already been said in a comment on the issue above, even having
> an option to hide/encrypt LUKS header would be helpful. One approach is to
> just encrypt the normal LUKS header with a header key, which is not very
> user-friendly as one would now have to remember/store both the passphrase and
> the header key (one might as well use plain dmcrypt with a single key).
>
> I guess the goal here would be to have LUKS features (multiple passphrases,
> ease of use, key splitting...) implemented in such a way that nobody can prove
> that you're using encryption. Thoughts?
>
>
> --
> Ivan Stankovic, pokemon@fly.srk.fer.hr
>
> "Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM,
> learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm"
> _______________________________________________
> dm-crypt mailing list
> dm-crypt@saout.de
> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
>
--
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@wagner.name
GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-12 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-12 21:53 [dm-crypt] cryptsetup, LUKS, plausible deniability Ivan Stankovic
2009-09-12 22:22 ` Arno Wagner [this message]
2009-09-13 8:56 ` Tommaso
2009-09-13 9:07 ` [dm-crypt] OT: spam? Tommaso
2009-09-13 9:12 ` Rick Moritz
2009-09-13 10:00 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-09-13 18:37 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-13 18:36 ` [dm-crypt] cryptsetup, LUKS, plausible deniability Arno Wagner
2009-09-13 19:44 ` Ivan Stankovic
2009-09-14 3:32 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-14 7:28 ` Rick Moritz
2009-09-14 21:04 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-13 18:04 ` Sven Eschenberg
[not found] ` <4AACA98F.2060002@redhat.com>
2009-09-13 18:28 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-13 18:52 ` Milan Broz
2009-09-14 1:21 ` Sitaram Chamarty
2009-09-14 11:25 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-14 20:56 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-14 23:45 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-15 0:04 ` test532
[not found] ` <6842.57094185359$1253045311@news.gmane.org>
2009-09-16 19:32 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-16 21:41 ` Debian User
2009-09-17 18:26 ` test532
2009-09-18 1:20 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-18 4:00 ` test532
[not found] ` <20090915200808.2DD0F4250006@tansi.org>
2009-09-15 20:32 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-16 19:41 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-16 21:30 ` Arno Wagner
2009-09-16 1:50 ` Moji
2009-09-16 19:50 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2009-09-16 21:05 ` test532
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090912222223.GA23233@tansi.org \
--to=arno@wagner.name \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox