From: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
To: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>,
dm-crypt@saout.de, htd@fancy-poultry.org
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] aes-xts-plain with aes_x86_64 makes my SSD 5x slower than my encrypted HD
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:39:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120722203929.GB3925@merlins.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120722202213.GA7306@fancy-poultry.org> <1342986452.26887.3.camel@scapa>
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:47:32PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
> I'm using Debian sid (so still at 3.2 kernel), currently using a 256G
> Samsung SSD. What I get is:
>
> root@scapa:~# hdparm -t /dev/sda /dev/mapper/scapa_crypt
>
> /dev/sda:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 690 MB in 3.01 seconds = 229.47 MB/sec
> /dev/mapper/scapa_crypt:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 590 MB in 3.00 seconds = 196.43 MB/sec
Right, that's more what I would expect.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:22:13PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> I don't know why reading speed is that slow in your case, especially
> as you are using AES-NI, which should give you the highest speed
> available. Maybe others here on the list have a suggestion. Probably,
> you should provide some more information.
I'm happy to if you tell me what else I can give.
Note how my test showed that I had the same aes-xts-plain on the hard drive
in the same laptop, and that one runs at 100MB/s, which is pretty much its
native speed.
Just to make sure that I'm not CPU limited, I tried
gandalfthegreat:~# dd if=/dev/sda4 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.23959 s, 479 MB/s
gandalfthegreat:~# dd if=/dev/mapper/ssdcrypt of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 44.3302 s, 24.2 MB/s
atop shows dd isn't really pegging a single core:
THR SYSCPU USRCPU RDDSK WRDSK ST EXC S CPUNR CPU CMD
1 0.60s 0.01s 226.2M 0K -- - D 3 6% dd
> Otherwise, on the newer Intel i3/i5/i7, twofish-3way is faster than
> AES. You could try to re-format your drive with twofish-xts-plain64
> and adding twofish_common, twofish_x86_64 and twofish_x86_64_3way to
> your initram (as long as your kernel is built with these enabled).
Thanks for the hint.
Since it's a lenovo T530 with a recent CPU, I tried it:
gandalfthegreat:~# cryptsetup -c twofish-xts-plain64 -s 256 luksFormat /dev/sda4
Result is the same:
gandalfthegreat:~# hdparm -tT /dev/mapper/ssdcrypt
/dev/mapper/ssdcrypt:
Timing cached reads: 16614 MB in 2.00 seconds = 8317.50 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 68 MB in 3.08 seconds = 22.09 MB/sec
Grumble.
It shouldn't be a hardware problem since I do see 400MB/s before encryption.
I'm a bit lost here. I'll try other kernels just in case, but that shouldn't
make a difference.
Thanks for the answers,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-22 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-22 19:07 [dm-crypt] aes-xts-plain with aes_x86_64 makes my SSD 5x slower than my encrypted HD Marc MERLIN
2012-07-22 19:47 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-07-22 20:39 ` Marc MERLIN [this message]
2012-07-22 21:47 ` Arno Wagner
2012-07-23 6:07 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-07-23 6:28 ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-23 8:14 ` Arno Wagner
2012-07-23 10:46 ` Milan Broz
2012-07-23 11:09 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-07-23 11:37 ` Milan Broz
2012-07-23 15:08 ` André Gall
2012-07-23 17:27 ` André Gall
2012-07-24 14:06 ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-24 14:16 ` Milan Broz
2012-07-23 16:12 ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-23 16:19 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-07-23 17:54 ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-23 19:26 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-07-23 17:15 ` Milan Broz
2012-07-23 17:51 ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-23 21:31 ` Milan Broz
2012-07-24 5:57 ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-24 6:25 ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-24 15:02 ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-24 15:19 ` Milan Broz
2012-07-24 16:09 ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-24 13:54 ` Milan Broz
[not found] ` <500E9099.8050501@redhat.com>
2012-07-24 14:27 ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-24 14:58 ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-24 15:38 ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-24 16:48 ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-24 6:11 ` Heinz Diehl
2012-07-22 21:55 ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-22 20:22 ` Heinz Diehl
2012-08-12 12:49 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-08-16 7:43 ` Marc MERLIN
[not found] ` <502D1F96.3080905@andregall.de>
2012-08-16 17:57 ` Marc MERLIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120722203929.GB3925@merlins.org \
--to=marc@merlins.org \
--cc=corsac@debian.org \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
--cc=htd@fancy-poultry.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox