Re: [dm-crypt] out of order encryption

[Vasile Catalin-B50542 <catalin.vasile@freescale.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1750 bytes --]

I was referring to the submitted requests.
Does the underlying encryption layer (CryptoAPI) have to ensure the
complete callbacks are called in the order the requests were submitted?
Or does dm-crypt figure out where to read/write after request is done
no matter in which order the crypto requests finished?

On 06.08.2015 12:15, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 08/06/2015 09:00 AM, Vasile Catalin-B50542 wrote:
>> Would dm-crypt execute correctly if sector encryption ended asynchronously?
>> For example:
>> If sector 1, 2, 3 are sent to be done asynchronously to the same
>> algorithm instance,
>> and the jobs end in the following order: 2, 1, 3; does the dm-crypt
>> module know to
>> write the data in the proper place when the encryption "done" callback
>> is called?
> Not sure if I understand your question - encryption in dmcrypt works on sector
> level, sectors are encrypted independetly, so order cannot influence result
> of encryption of individual sectors.
>
> Or if the question is about order of submitted requests:
> If you need to ensure order of processing, you have to issue "flush" operation
> before submitting next data content. Filesystems typically must do this when
> handling journal or so.
>
> In general, requests order can be rearranged (anywhere in block layer, not only in dmcrypt).
> But this is correct behaviour.
>
> Milan

-- 

CatalinVasile

Intern, DN-Software

FreescaleSemiconductor, Inc.

www.freescale.com

phone: 073-021-1938

e-mail: catalin.vasile@freescale.com <mailto:your.name@freescale.com>

*Freescale_Logo-nosemi_Lh_4c***

This e-mail, and any associated attachments have been classified as:

[ ] Public

[ ] Freescale Semiconductor Internal Use Only

[ ] Freescale Semiconductor Confidential Proprietary


[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/html, Size: 29900 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.2: image002.gif --]
[-- Type: image/gif, Size: 1979 bytes --]