From: Vasile Catalin-B50542 <catalin.vasile@freescale.com>
To: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>, dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] out of order encryption
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:38:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C33919.40101@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C325AE.6070604@gmail.com>
I was referring to the submitted requests.
Does the underlying encryption layer (CryptoAPI) have to ensure the
complete callbacks are called in the order the requests were submitted?
Or does dm-crypt figure out where to read/write after request is done
no matter in which order the crypto requests finished?
On 06.08.2015 12:15, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 08/06/2015 09:00 AM, Vasile Catalin-B50542 wrote:
>> Would dm-crypt execute correctly if sector encryption ended asynchronously?
>> For example:
>> If sector 1, 2, 3 are sent to be done asynchronously to the same
>> algorithm instance,
>> and the jobs end in the following order: 2, 1, 3; does the dm-crypt
>> module know to
>> write the data in the proper place when the encryption "done" callback
>> is called?
> Not sure if I understand your question - encryption in dmcrypt works on sector
> level, sectors are encrypted independetly, so order cannot influence result
> of encryption of individual sectors.
>
> Or if the question is about order of submitted requests:
> If you need to ensure order of processing, you have to issue "flush" operation
> before submitting next data content. Filesystems typically must do this when
> handling journal or so.
>
> In general, requests order can be rearranged (anywhere in block layer, not only in dmcrypt).
> But this is correct behaviour.
>
> Milan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-06 7:00 [dm-crypt] out of order encryption Vasile Catalin-B50542
2015-08-06 9:15 ` Milan Broz
2015-08-06 10:12 ` Vasile Catalin-B50542
2015-08-06 10:38 ` Vasile Catalin-B50542 [this message]
2015-08-06 11:06 ` Milan Broz
2015-08-06 11:19 ` Lars Winterfeld
2015-08-06 11:32 ` Vasile Catalin-B50542
2015-08-06 11:46 ` Lars Winterfeld
2015-08-06 11:48 ` Milan Broz
2015-08-06 12:10 ` Vasile Catalin-B50542
2015-08-06 12:40 ` Milan Broz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C33919.40101@freescale.com \
--to=catalin.vasile@freescale.com \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox