Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:06:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1506092775.2512.5.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170922013506.22510-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 09:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> +		/*
> +		 * blk-mq's SCHED_RESTART can cover this requeue, so
> +		 * we needn't to deal with it by DELAY_REQUEUE. More
> +		 * importantly, we have to return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE
> +		 * so that blk-mq can get the queue busy feedback,
> +		 * otherwise I/O merge can be hurt.
> +		 */
> +		if (q->mq_ops)
> +			return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
> +		else
> +			return DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEUE;
>  	}

This patch is inferior to what I posted because this patch does not avoid
the delay if multiple LUNs are associated with the same SCSI host. Consider
e.g. the following configuration:
* A single SCSI host with two SCSI LUNs associated to that host, e.g. /dev/sda
  and /dev/sdb.
* A dm-mpath instance has been created on top of /dev/sda.
If all tags are in use by requests queued to /dev/sdb, no dm requests are in
progress and a request is submitted against the dm-mpath device then the
blk_get_request(q, GFP_ATOMIC) call will fail. The request will be requeued
and the queue will be rerun after a delay.

My patch does not introduce a delay in this case.

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-22 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-22  1:35 [PATCH] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure Ming Lei
2017-09-22 15:06 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-09-22 17:44   ` Ming Lei
2017-09-22 17:54     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-25  3:06       ` Ming Lei
2017-09-25 15:23         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-25 16:10           ` Ming Lei
2017-09-25 16:17             ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-26  8:50               ` Ming Lei
2017-09-26 13:55                 ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1506092775.2512.5.camel@wdc.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox