From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/12] libmutipath: continue to use old state on PATH_PENDING
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 17:12:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552086725-18476-9-git-send-email-bmarzins@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552086725-18476-1-git-send-email-bmarzins@redhat.com>
When pathinfo() sets pp->state to PATH_PENDING, it can cause problems
with path checking. It should act more like check_path(). When
check_path() sees a new state of PATH_PENDING, it doesn't update the
path state at all, so a path's old state is normally never PATH_PENDING.
As and example of the problems of setting a path to PATH_PENDING, If
check_path() sets a path's state to PATH_UP, then a call to pathinfo()
sets the state to PATH_PENDING, and then another call the check_path()
sets the state to PATH_DOWN, multipathd won't fail the path in the
kernel. Also, if a path's state is PATH_PENDING, and nr_active is
recalculated, that path will count as down, even if the state was
previously PATH_UP. If a path already has a state of PATH_WILD or
PATH_UNCHECKED, changing it to PATH_PENDING won't hurt anything, and it
will help anyone who sees it know what's actually happening. But
otherwise, pathinfo() should leave the previous state alone.
Reviewed-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
---
libmultipath/discovery.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libmultipath/discovery.c b/libmultipath/discovery.c
index b08cb2d..28c00e5 100644
--- a/libmultipath/discovery.c
+++ b/libmultipath/discovery.c
@@ -1946,8 +1946,11 @@ int pathinfo(struct path *pp, struct config *conf, int mask)
if (mask & DI_CHECKER) {
if (path_state == PATH_UP) {
- pp->chkrstate = pp->state = get_state(pp, conf, 0,
- path_state);
+ int newstate = get_state(pp, conf, 0, path_state);
+ if (newstate != PATH_PENDING ||
+ pp->state == PATH_UNCHECKED ||
+ pp->state == PATH_WILD)
+ pp->chkrstate = pp->state = newstate;
if (pp->state == PATH_TIMEOUT)
pp->state = PATH_DOWN;
if (pp->state == PATH_UP && !pp->size) {
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-08 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-08 23:11 [PATCH v2 00/12] Misc Multipath patches Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-08 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] libmultipath: disable user_friendly_names for NetApp Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-17 15:04 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2019-03-18 9:45 ` Martin Wilck
2019-03-08 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] libmultipath: handle existing paths in marginal_path enqueue Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-08 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] multipathd: cleanup marginal paths checking timers Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-08 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] libmultipath: fix marginal paths queueing errors Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-08 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] libmultipath: fix marginal_paths nr_active check Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-08 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] multipathd: Fix miscounting active paths Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-08 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] multipathd: ignore failed wwid recheck Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-15 11:48 ` Martin Wilck
2019-03-19 17:13 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-08 23:12 ` Benjamin Marzinski [this message]
2019-03-08 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] multipathd: use update_path_groups instead of reload_map Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-15 11:49 ` Martin Wilck
2019-03-08 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] multipath.conf: add missing options to man page Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-15 11:49 ` Martin Wilck
2019-03-19 17:14 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-08 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] libmultipath: add get_uid fallback code for NVMe devices Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-15 11:49 ` Martin Wilck
2019-03-19 17:15 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-20 7:55 ` Martin Wilck
2019-03-08 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] multipathd: change failed get_uid handling Benjamin Marzinski
2019-03-15 11:50 ` Martin Wilck
2019-03-19 17:20 ` Benjamin Marzinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1552086725-18476-9-git-send-email-bmarzins@redhat.com \
--to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox