Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] dm: eliminate 'split_discard_bios' flag from DM target interface
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:36:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190221043626.GC31000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190220214436.38476-3-snitzer@redhat.com>

On Wed, Feb 20 2019 at  4:44pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:

> There is no need to have DM core split discards on behalf of a DM target
> now that blk_queue_split() handles splitting discards based on the
> queue_limits.  A DM target just needs to set max_discard_sectors,
> discard_granularity, etc, in queue_limits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c  |  1 -
>  drivers/md/dm-raid.c          | 14 +++++++++-----
>  drivers/md/dm-thin.c          |  1 -
>  drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c  |  1 -
>  drivers/md/dm.c               | 28 ++++++----------------------
>  include/linux/device-mapper.h |  6 ------
>  include/uapi/linux/dm-ioctl.h |  4 ++--
>  7 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 

...

> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> index 7a774fcd0194..b988e178a523 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -1478,17 +1478,10 @@ static unsigned get_num_write_zeroes_bios(struct dm_target *ti)
>  	return ti->num_write_zeroes_bios;
>  }
>  
> -typedef bool (*is_split_required_fn)(struct dm_target *ti);
> -
> -static bool is_split_required_for_discard(struct dm_target *ti)
> -{
> -	return ti->split_discard_bios;
> -}
> -
>  static int __send_changing_extent_only(struct clone_info *ci, struct dm_target *ti,
> -				       unsigned num_bios, bool is_split_required)
> +				       unsigned num_bios)
>  {
> -	unsigned len;
> +	unsigned len = ci->sector_count;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Even though the device advertised support for this type of
> @@ -1499,38 +1492,29 @@ static int __send_changing_extent_only(struct clone_info *ci, struct dm_target *
>  	if (!num_bios)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> -	if (!is_split_required)
> -		len = min((sector_t)ci->sector_count, max_io_len_target_boundary(ci->sector, ti));
> -	else
> -		len = min((sector_t)ci->sector_count, max_io_len(ci->sector, ti));
> -
>  	__send_duplicate_bios(ci, ti, num_bios, &len);
>  
> -	ci->sector += len;
> -	ci->sector_count -= len;
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }

The above was bogus, ci->sector and ci->sector_count must be updated.
Reintroducing adjustments based on 'len' fixed a discard crash Ming
reported.

Now fixed in linux-next.

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-21  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-20 21:44 [PATCH v2 0/9] dm: changes staged in linux-next for 5.1 so far Mike Snitzer
2019-02-20 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] dm: update dm_process_bio() to split bio if in ->make_request_fn() Mike Snitzer
2019-02-20 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] dm: eliminate 'split_discard_bios' flag from DM target interface Mike Snitzer
2019-02-21  4:36   ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2019-02-20 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] dm: refactor start_io_acct and end_io_acct Mike Snitzer
2019-02-20 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] dm: implement noclone optimization for bio-based Mike Snitzer
2019-02-20 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] dm: improve noclone bio support Mike Snitzer
2019-02-22 10:59   ` Mikulas Patocka
2019-02-22 15:22     ` Mike Snitzer
2019-02-22 16:56       ` Mike Snitzer
2019-02-20 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] dm: add per-bio-data support to noclone bio Mike Snitzer
2019-02-20 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] dm: improve noclone_endio() to support multipath target Mike Snitzer
2019-02-20 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] dm mpath: enable noclone support for bio-based Mike Snitzer
2019-02-20 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] dm: remove unused _rq_tio_cache and _rq_cache Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190221043626.GC31000@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox