Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] Fix max path checker timing
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 08:59:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5183603F.5000003@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367531197-8987-12-git-send-email-bmarzins@redhat.com>

On 05/02/2013 11:46 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> Due to some code being placed inside the wrong block, the number of
> seconds to wait between path checks (pp->tick), was only getting set to
> the path's individual check interval if that wasn't equal to the max
> check interval.  Otherwise it was using the default for a failed path.
> This patch makes sure that pp->ticks always always gets set correctly
> for active paths.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
> ---
>  multipathd/main.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/multipathd/main.c b/multipathd/main.c
> index 440d254..df1c5b9 100644
> --- a/multipathd/main.c
> +++ b/multipathd/main.c
> @@ -1219,11 +1219,10 @@ check_path (struct vectors * vecs, struct path * pp)
>  					pp->checkint = 2 * pp->checkint;
>  				else
>  					pp->checkint = conf->max_checkint;
> -
> -				pp->tick = pp->checkint;
> -				condlog(4, "%s: delay next check %is",
> -					pp->dev_t, pp->tick);
>  			}
> +			pp->tick = pp->checkint;
> +			condlog(4, "%s: delay next check %is",
> +				pp->dev_t, pp->tick);
>  		}
>  	}
>  	else if (newstate == PATH_DOWN) {
> 
But then the message is wrong, isn't it?
We should be printing the 'delay next check' message only
if the check was actually delayed, ie inside the block.

So I think something like this should be more appropriate
(minus line-breaks, of course):

diff --git a/multipathd/main.c b/multipathd/main.c
index 6471d24..9901b02 100644
--- a/multipathd/main.c
+++ b/multipathd/main.c
@@ -1235,10 +1235,10 @@ check_path (struct vectors * vecs, struct
path * pp)
                                else
                                        pp->checkint =
conf->max_checkint;

-                               pp->tick = pp->checkint;
                                condlog(4, "%s: delay next check %is",
                                        pp->dev_t, pp->tick);
                        }
+                       pp->tick = pp->checkint;
                }
        }
        else if (newstate == PATH_DOWN) {


Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-03  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-02 21:46 [PATCH 00/16] multipath-tools: miscellaneous multipath patches Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 01/16] Make kpartx advise modprobe instead of insmod Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 02/16] Make kpartx correctly handle non-512 byte GPT Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 03/16] Fix print_multipath_topology for large outputs Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 04/16] Don't print checker messages for ghost paths Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 05/16] Fix a couple of signal issues Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-03  6:36   ` Bart Van Assche
2013-05-03 20:24     ` Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-04  7:19       ` Bart Van Assche
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 06/16] Fix hardware entry matching code Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 07/16] Fix some socket issues Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 08/16] Avoid race between ueventloop and uevqloop Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 09/16] Add existing multipath devices to wwids file on Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 10/16] add wwids file cleanup options Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 11/16] Fix max path checker timing Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-03  6:59   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2013-05-03 15:44     ` Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-03 17:59       ` [PATCH v2 " Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-06  5:42         ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 12/16] Make set_multipath_wwid actually do something Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 13/16] Make multipathd deal better with uninitialized paths Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 14/16] Stop annoying prio_lookup warning messages Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 15/16] make multipathd disable queue_without_daemon by default Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 16/16] Use mapname to choose kpartx delimiter Benjamin Marzinski
2013-05-06 19:45 ` [PATCH 00/16] multipath-tools: miscellaneous multipath patches Christophe Varoqui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5183603F.5000003@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox