From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:32:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54943714.2040704@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141217230622.GC15390@redhat.com>
On 12/18/14 00:06, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> So if you know someone with relevant blk-mq hardware who might benefit
> from blk-mq multipathing please point them at this code and have them
> report back!
Hello Mike,
Great to see that you are working on blk-mq multipathing. Unfortunately
a test with the SRP initiator and your dm-for-3.20-blk-mq tree merged
with Linus' latest tree was not successful. This is what was reported
when I tried to start multipathd (without call trace, followed by a
hard lockup):
=========================================================
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
3.18.0-debug+ #1 Tainted: G W
---------------------------------------------------------
kdmwork-253:0/5347 just changed the state of lock:
(&(&m->lock)->rlock){+.....}, at: [<ffffffffa080eb80>] __multipath_map.isra.15+0x40/0x1f0 [dm_multipath]
but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past:
(&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...}
and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
This is how objdump translates the assembler code of the above kernel address (0x1b80 below):
static int __multipath_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct request *clone,
1b62: 48 89 55 c8 mov %rdx,-0x38(%rbp)
1b66: 4c 89 45 c0 mov %r8,-0x40(%rbp)
union map_info *map_context,
struct request *rq, struct request **__clone)
{
struct multipath *m = (struct multipath *) ti->private;
int r = DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
size_t nr_bytes = clone ? blk_rq_bytes(clone) : blk_rq_bytes(rq);
1b6a: 0f 84 50 01 00 00 je 1cc0 <__multipath_map.isra.15+0x180>
1b70: 44 8b 66 5c mov 0x5c(%rsi),%r12d
raw_spin_lock_init(&(_lock)->rlock); \
} while (0)
static inline void spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
{
raw_spin_lock(&lock->rlock);
1b74: 49 8d 5e 28 lea 0x28(%r14),%rbx
1b78: 48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi
1b7b: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 1b80 <__multipath_map.isra.15+0x40>
struct dm_mpath_io *mpio;
spin_lock(&m->lock);
/* Do we need to select a new pgpath? */
if (!m->current_pgpath ||
1b80: 49 8b 8e d0 00 00 00 mov 0xd0(%r14),%rcx
1b87: 48 85 c9 test %rcx,%rcx
1b8a: 74 55 je 1be1 <__multipath_map.isra.15+0xa1>
(!m->queue_io && (m->repeat_count && --m->repeat_count == 0)))
1b8c: 41 0f b6 96 ec 00 00 movzbl 0xec(%r14),%edx
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-19 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-17 3:59 [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] block: require blk_rq_prep_clone() be given an initialized clone request Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] block: initialize bio member of blk-mq request to NULL Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] block: add blk-mq support to blk_insert_cloned_request() Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] block: mark blk-mq devices as stackable Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] dm: remove exports for request-based interfaces without external callers Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] dm: split request structure out from dm_rq_target_io structure Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] dm: submit stacked requests in irq enabled context Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] dm: allocate requests from target when stacking on blk-mq devices Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 22:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Keith Busch
2014-12-17 21:43 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-17 23:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-18 1:41 ` Keith Busch
2014-12-18 4:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-19 14:32 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2014-12-19 15:38 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-19 17:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-22 15:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-22 18:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-23 16:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-23 17:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-23 21:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 13:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-24 18:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 18:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 19:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-02 17:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-05 21:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-06 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-06 9:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-06 16:05 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls [was: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support] Mike Snitzer
2015-01-06 16:15 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 10:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-07 15:32 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 16:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 16:18 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 16:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 16:24 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 17:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 17:35 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 20:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 20:40 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-09 19:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-09 21:07 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 21:11 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 21:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-09 21:56 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 22:25 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-10 0:27 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-10 1:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-10 1:59 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-10 3:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 14:46 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 15:42 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 16:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 16:34 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 16:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 16:59 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 17:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 17:09 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 17:53 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 18:12 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 18:22 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 18:35 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 19:11 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 20:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 12:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 14:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 14:28 ` dm + blk-mq soft lockup complaint Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 16:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-14 9:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-14 18:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-15 8:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-15 15:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-15 15:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 14:59 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Jens Axboe
2015-01-13 15:11 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-13 15:27 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-13 15:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 15:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-27 18:42 ` blk-mq DM changes for 3.20 [was: Re: blk-mq request allocation stalls] Mike Snitzer
2015-01-28 16:42 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-28 17:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-28 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-28 18:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-29 22:43 ` blk-mq DM changes for 3.20 [was: Re: blk-mq request allocation stalls]X Keith Busch
2015-01-29 23:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-29 23:44 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-30 0:32 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 19:05 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 19:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 18:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54943714.2040704@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox