From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: blk-mq request allocation stalls [was: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support]
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:56:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B04E94.3010403@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150109214015.GA1032@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1509 bytes --]
On 01/09/2015 02:40 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09 2015 at 4:11pm -0500,
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually, try this one instead, it should be a bit more precise than
>> the first.
>>
>
> Thanks for the test patch.
>
> I'm still seeing failures that look wrong (last_tag=127 could be edge
> condition not handled properly?):
>
> [ 14.254632] __bt_get: values before for loop: last_tag=127, index=3
> [ 14.255841] __bt_get: values after for loop: last_tag=64, index=2
> [ 14.257036]
> [ 14.257036] bt_get: __bt_get() returned -1
> [ 14.258051] queue_num=0, nr_tags=128, reserved_tags=0, bits_per_word=5
> [ 14.259246] nr_free=128, nr_reserved=0
> [ 14.259963] active_queues=0
>
> [ 213.115997] __bt_get: values before for loop: last_tag=127, index=3
> [ 213.117115] __bt_get: values after for loop: last_tag=96, index=3
> [ 213.118200]
> [ 213.118200] bt_get: __bt_get() returned -1
> [ 213.121593] queue_num=0, nr_tags=128, reserved_tags=0, bits_per_word=5
> [ 213.123960] nr_free=128, nr_reserved=0
> [ 213.125880] active_queues=0
>
> [ 239.158079] __bt_get: values before for loop: last_tag=8, index=0
> [ 239.160363] __bt_get: values after for loop: last_tag=0, index=0
> [ 239.162896]
> [ 239.162896] bt_get: __bt_get() returned -1
> [ 239.166284] queue_num=0, nr_tags=128, reserved_tags=0, bits_per_word=5
> [ 239.168623] nr_free=127, nr_reserved=0
> [ 239.170508] active_queues=0
Thanks for testing, can you try this one?
--
Jens Axboe
[-- Attachment #2: tag-v3.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1399 bytes --]
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 60c9d4a93fe4..4130c2bdc6c0 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -143,28 +143,31 @@ static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
static int __bt_get_word(struct blk_align_bitmap *bm, unsigned int last_tag)
{
int tag, org_last_tag, end;
- bool wrap = last_tag != 0;
org_last_tag = last_tag;
end = bm->depth;
- do {
-restart:
- tag = find_next_zero_bit(&bm->word, end, last_tag);
+ while (1) {
+ tag = find_next_zero_bit(&bm->word, bm->depth, last_tag);
if (unlikely(tag >= end)) {
/*
* We started with an offset, start from 0 to
* exhaust the map.
*/
- if (wrap) {
- wrap = false;
+ if (org_last_tag) {
end = org_last_tag;
- last_tag = 0;
- goto restart;
+ last_tag = org_last_tag = 0;
+ continue;
}
return -1;
}
+
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(tag, &bm->word))
+ break;
+
last_tag = tag + 1;
- } while (test_and_set_bit(tag, &bm->word));
+ if (last_tag >= bm->depth - 1)
+ last_tag = 0;
+ }
return tag;
}
@@ -199,9 +202,13 @@ static int __bt_get(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct blk_mq_bitmap_tags *bt,
goto done;
}
- last_tag = 0;
- if (++index >= bt->map_nr)
+ index++;
+ last_tag = (index << bt->bits_per_word);
+
+ if (index >= bt->map_nr) {
index = 0;
+ last_tag = 0;
+ }
}
*tag_cache = 0;
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-17 3:59 [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] block: require blk_rq_prep_clone() be given an initialized clone request Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] block: initialize bio member of blk-mq request to NULL Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] block: add blk-mq support to blk_insert_cloned_request() Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] block: mark blk-mq devices as stackable Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] dm: remove exports for request-based interfaces without external callers Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] dm: split request structure out from dm_rq_target_io structure Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] dm: submit stacked requests in irq enabled context Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] dm: allocate requests from target when stacking on blk-mq devices Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 22:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Keith Busch
2014-12-17 21:43 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-17 23:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-18 1:41 ` Keith Busch
2014-12-18 4:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-19 14:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-19 15:38 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-19 17:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-22 15:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-22 18:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-23 16:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-23 17:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-23 21:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 13:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-24 18:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 18:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 19:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-02 17:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-05 21:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-06 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-06 9:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-06 16:05 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls [was: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support] Mike Snitzer
2015-01-06 16:15 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 10:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-07 15:32 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 16:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 16:18 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 16:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 16:24 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 17:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 17:35 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 20:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 20:40 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-09 19:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-09 21:07 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 21:11 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 21:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-09 21:56 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-01-09 22:25 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-10 0:27 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-10 1:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-10 1:59 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-10 3:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 14:46 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 15:42 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 16:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 16:34 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 16:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 16:59 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 17:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 17:09 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 17:53 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 18:12 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 18:22 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 18:35 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 19:11 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 20:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 12:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 14:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 14:28 ` dm + blk-mq soft lockup complaint Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 16:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-14 9:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-14 18:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-15 8:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-15 15:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-15 15:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 14:59 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Jens Axboe
2015-01-13 15:11 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-13 15:27 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-13 15:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 15:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-27 18:42 ` blk-mq DM changes for 3.20 [was: Re: blk-mq request allocation stalls] Mike Snitzer
2015-01-28 16:42 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-28 17:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-28 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-28 18:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-29 22:43 ` blk-mq DM changes for 3.20 [was: Re: blk-mq request allocation stalls]X Keith Busch
2015-01-29 23:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-29 23:44 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-30 0:32 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 19:05 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 19:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 18:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B04E94.3010403@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox