From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: tj@kernel.org, dennis@kernel.org
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [dm-devel] can we reduce bio_set_dev overhead due to bio_associate_blkg?
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:52:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkSK6mU1fja2OykG@redhat.com> (raw)
Hey Tejun and Dennis,
I recently found that due to bio_set_dev()'s call to
bio_associate_blkg(), bio_set_dev() needs much more cpu than ideal;
especially when doing 4K IOs via io_uring's HIPRI bio-polling.
I'm very naive about blk-cgroups.. so I'm hopeful you or others can
help me cut through this to understand what the ideal outcome should
be for DM's bio clone + remap heavy use-case as it relates to
bio_associate_blkg.
If I hack dm-linear with a local __bio_set_dev that simply removes
the call to bio_associate_blkg() my IOPS go from ~980K to 995K.
Looking at what is happening a bit, relative to this DM bio cloning
usecase, it seems __bio_clone() calls bio_clone_blkg_association() to
clone the blkg from DM device, then dm-linear.c:linear_map's call
to bio_set_dev() will cause bio_associate_blkg(bio) to reuse the css
but then it triggers an update because the bdev is being remapped in
the bio (due to linear_map sending the IO to the real underlying
device). End result _seems_ like collective wasteful effort to get the
blk-cgroup resources setup properly in the face of a simple remap.
Seems the current DM pattern is causing repeat blkg work for _every_
remapped bio? Do you see a way to speed up repeat calls to
bio_associate_blkg()?
Test kernel is my latest dm-5.19 branch (though latest Linus 5.18-rc0
kernel should be fine too):
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-5.19
I'm using dm-linear ontop on a 16G blk-mq null_blk device:
modprobe null_blk queue_mode=2 poll_queues=2 bs=4096 gb=16
SIZE=`blockdev --getsz /dev/nullb0`
echo "0 $SIZE linear /dev/nullb0 0" | dmsetup create linear
And running the workload with fio using this wrapper script:
io_uring.sh 20 1 /dev/mapper/linear 4096
#!/bin/bash
RTIME=$1
JOBS=$2
DEV=$3
BS=$4
QD=64
BATCH=16
HI=1
fio --bs=$BS --ioengine=io_uring --fixedbufs --registerfiles --hipri=$HI \
--iodepth=$QD \
--iodepth_batch_submit=$BATCH \
--iodepth_batch_complete_min=$BATCH \
--filename=$DEV \
--direct=1 --runtime=$RTIME --numjobs=$JOBS --rw=randread \
--name=test --group_reporting
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-31 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-30 16:52 Mike Snitzer [this message]
2022-03-30 12:28 ` [dm-devel] can we reduce bio_set_dev overhead due to bio_associate_blkg? Dennis Zhou
2022-03-31 4:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-31 5:52 ` Dennis Zhou
2022-03-31 9:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-08 15:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-09 5:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-11 16:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-11 17:16 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-11 17:33 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] block: remove redundant blk-cgroup init from __bio_clone Mike Snitzer
2022-04-12 5:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-12 7:52 ` Dennis Zhou
2022-04-23 16:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-26 17:30 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkSK6mU1fja2OykG@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox