* [PATCH] dma: fsldma: convert to platform_get_irq_optional()
@ 2026-06-03 19:19 Rosen Penev
2026-06-03 19:29 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rosen Penev @ 2026-06-03 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dmaengine
Cc: Zhang Wei, Vinod Koul, Frank Li, open list:FREESCALE DMA DRIVER,
open list
Replace the per-controller irq_of_parse_and_map() call with
platform_get_irq_optional(). The controller IRQ is optional — when
absent (-ENXIO) the driver falls back to per-channel IRQs. Any other
error is treated as fatal. The corresponding irq_dispose_mapping()
calls in the probe error path and remove function are removed.
The per-channel IRQ mapping in fsl_dma_chan_probe() uses a child
device_node rather than the platform device's of_node, so it is not
converted here.
Assisted-by: opencode:big-pickle
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
drivers/dma/fsldma.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
index 98d02809ade5..08a8090178f8 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
@@ -1239,7 +1239,16 @@ static int fsldma_of_probe(struct platform_device *op)
}
/* map the channel IRQ if it exists, but don't hookup the handler yet */
- fdev->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op->dev.of_node, 0);
+ fdev->irq = platform_get_irq_optional(op, 0);
+ if (fdev->irq < 0) {
+ if (fdev->irq != -ENXIO) {
+ err = fdev->irq;
+ iounmap(fdev->regs);
+ kfree(fdev);
+ return err;
+ }
+ fdev->irq = 0;
+ }
dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, fdev->common.cap_mask);
dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, fdev->common.cap_mask);
@@ -1301,7 +1310,6 @@ static int fsldma_of_probe(struct platform_device *op)
if (fdev->chan[i])
fsl_dma_chan_remove(fdev->chan[i]);
}
- irq_dispose_mapping(fdev->irq);
iounmap(fdev->regs);
out_free:
kfree(fdev);
@@ -1323,7 +1331,6 @@ static void fsldma_of_remove(struct platform_device *op)
if (fdev->chan[i])
fsl_dma_chan_remove(fdev->chan[i]);
}
- irq_dispose_mapping(fdev->irq);
iounmap(fdev->regs);
kfree(fdev);
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dma: fsldma: convert to platform_get_irq_optional()
2026-06-03 19:19 [PATCH] dma: fsldma: convert to platform_get_irq_optional() Rosen Penev
@ 2026-06-03 19:29 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-06-03 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rosen Penev; +Cc: dmaengine, Frank.Li, vkoul
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing tasklet_kill() in channel removal causes use-after-free of channel structure.
- [High] Ignored return value of dma_async_device_register() causes silent probe failure and later kernel panic.
--
commit a1cff40cb09109b8d2ad16457c9eff5f0adadc62
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
dma: fsldma: convert to platform_get_irq_optional()
Replace the per-controller irq_of_parse_and_map() call with
platform_get_irq_optional(). The controller IRQ is optional — when
absent (-ENXIO) the driver falls back to per-channel IRQs.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> index 22d62d958abd9..a98a7798fd180 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1300,7 +1309,6 @@ static int fsldma_of_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> if (fdev->chan[i])
> fsl_dma_chan_remove(fdev->chan[i]);
> }
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does fsl_dma_chan_remove()
safely handle scheduled tasklets?
During driver removal, the driver calls fsldma_free_irqs() which executes
free_irq(). While free_irq() waits for currently executing interrupt
handlers to finish, it does not stop or wait for scheduled tasklets.
Immediately after, fsl_dma_chan_remove() frees the channel structure:
drivers/dma/fsldma.c:fsl_dma_chan_remove() {
irq_dispose_mapping(chan->irq);
list_del(&chan->common.device_node);
iounmap(chan->regs);
kfree(chan);
}
If an interrupt scheduled the tasklet just before free_irq() was called,
the tasklet could execute asynchronously on freed memory, leading to a
use-after-free when dma_do_tasklet() dereferences the chan pointer.
Should there be a call to tasklet_kill(&chan->tasklet) before freeing
the channel?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but is it safe to ignore the return
value of dma_async_device_register() during the probe?
Looking at fsldma_of_probe(), the driver unconditionally returns 0
after attempting registration:
drivers/dma/fsldma.c:fsldma_of_probe() {
...
err = fsldma_request_irqs(fdev);
if (err) {
dev_err(fdev->dev, "unable to request IRQs\n");
goto out_free_fdev;
}
dma_async_device_register(&fdev->common);
return 0;
}
If dma_async_device_register() fails, the global_node list head remains
zero-initialized, but the driver still successfully binds.
Later during device teardown, fsldma_of_remove() blindly unregisters:
drivers/dma/fsldma.c:fsldma_of_remove() {
...
dma_async_device_unregister(&fdev->common);
...
}
Would this cause dma_async_device_unregister() to call list_del_rcu() on
a NULL pointer, resulting in a kernel panic?
> - irq_dispose_mapping(fdev->irq);
> iounmap(fdev->regs);
> out_free:
> kfree(fdev);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603191951.5729-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-03 19:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-03 19:19 [PATCH] dma: fsldma: convert to platform_get_irq_optional() Rosen Penev
2026-06-03 19:29 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox